<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">RUDN Journal of Economics</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">RUDN Journal of Economics</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Экономика</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2313-2329</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2408-8986</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">23502</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22363/2313-2329-2020-28-1-172-183</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>WORLD CAPITAL MARKET</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>МИРОВОЙ РЫНОК КАПИТАЛА</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">U.S. in the global FDI’ flows: repatriation of foreign earning by U.S. from EU members as the new global trend</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>США в глобальных потоках ПИИ: репатриация американского капитала на примере Европейского союза как новый глобальный тренд</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Konovalova</surname><given-names>Yulia A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Коновалова</surname><given-names>Юлия Александровна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Candidate of Science (in Economics), the head teacher of the International Economic Relations Department</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>кандидат экономических наук, старший преподаватель кафедры международных экономических отношений</p></bio><email>konovalova_yua@pfur.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Российский университет дружбы народов</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2020-12-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>12</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>28</volume><issue>1</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">VOL 28, NO1 (2020)</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">ТОМ 28, №1 (2020)</issue-title><fpage>172</fpage><lpage>183</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2020-04-18"><day>18</day><month>04</month><year>2020</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2020, Konovalova Y.A.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2020, Коновалова Ю.А.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2020</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Konovalova Y.A.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Коновалова Ю.А.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rudn.ru/economics/article/view/23502">https://journals.rudn.ru/economics/article/view/23502</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Scientific investigation covers the questions of U.S.’ involvedness into the international economic relations and into the international trade of goods and services and international movement of FDI as well. The fact that USA is the larger importer and the second exporter of goods in the world (2018), and the largest exporter and importer of commercial services (2018), the biggest host economy of FDI, and the largest investor (till 2017) the investigation of the American investment cooperation is the rather important affair, that can show the tough dependence of U.S.’ economy of foreign countries investments flows and regimes. In accordance with UNCTAD data U.S. is holding the first place as the exporter of FDI during the long period till 2018, that showed the negative number of FDI outflow in 2018 as the result of tax reform’ implementation at the end of 2017. Implementation of open and tough foreign trade policy (the policy of protectionism) through the import tariffs increasing is aimed at trade deficit reduction, protection and support of the American producers, implementation of tax reform at the end of 2017, making come true the soundbites of D. Trump “Make America Great Again” and “America first”. The author analyzed investment cooperation of U.S. and EU, its dynamic, specialization, directions. The author came to conclusion that correlation of United States’ investment indicators with European Union showed an unequal evaluation of each Union’ member and determined the disproportion of understanding and examination of regional integration not as the complex subject of the global economy but as the set of different and independent subjects. Investigation of U.S.’ FDI export and import statistics gave the author opportunity to come the conclusion that there is the specific of U.S.’ investment outflow into the European Union countries reflected through the limited set of investment recipients. At the same time, implementation of the tax reforms at the end of 2017 could lead to the changing of global investment flows from low tax jurisdictions to USA, for example.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>По последним данным ЮНКТАД, опубликованным в 2019 г., мировой объем ПИИ продолжает сокращаться третий год подряд, упав на 13 % до 1,3 трлн долл. Основной причиной, с которой эксперты ЮНКТАД связывают данное падение, являются проведенные в конце 2017 г. налоговые реформы в США, в результате которых многонациональные предприятия США начали репатриацию прибыли, накопленной в течение 2018 г. Если до прихода Д. Трампа в Белый дом США занимали лидирующее место в списке стран мировых экспортеров ПИИ, то в 2018 г. США не присутствуют в ТОР-20, поскольку показатель экспорта американских ПИИ в 2018 г. идет со знаком минус. Д. Трамп продолжает следовать выбранному курсу внешнеэкономической политики, решая внутренние проблемы через перекраивание международных правил и принципов ВТО, увеличение импортных пошлин с опорой на национальное законодательство, выход из ТТП и полное прекращение переговорного процесса по достижению соглашения по ТТИП. Автором выявлено, что в контексте американо-европейского сотрудничества репатриация американского капитала главным образом происходит из стран с низкой налоговой юрисдикцией - Ирландии (-10,5 млрд долл.) и Нидерландов (-26,5 млрд долл.). На страны Европейского союза приходится 16 140, или 45,6 % (2017 г.) аффилированных предприятий американских транснациональных корпораций с контрольным пакетом акций (всего - 35 374 в 2017 г.). Основными странами базирования аффилированных предприятий американских корпораций являются Великобритания, Нидерланды, Германия, Франция, Ирландия - наиболее сильные экономики по сравнению с другими членами ЕС, обладающие привлекательными и выгодными конкурентными преимуществами. Специфика деятельности американских компаний в странах Европейского союза заключается в ориентации инвестиций на промышленное производство, информацию, финансовые и страховые услуги, холдинговые компании (51 % в 2017 г.) и другие виды деятельности. Именно холдинговые компании обеспечили основной объем репатриации прибыли, полученной в 2018 г., и обозначили тенденцию к оттоку ранее экспортированного капитала из низконалоговых юрисдикций, что может задать новый тон глобальному потоку прямых иностранных инвестиций.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>United States</kwd><kwd>European Union</kwd><kwd>trade and economic cooperation</kwd><kwd>inflow and outflow of investment</kwd><kwd>investment destination</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>США</kwd><kwd>ЕС</kwd><kwd>ПИИ</kwd><kwd>накопленные инвестиции</kwd><kwd>география приложения</kwd><kwd>специализация</kwd><kwd>глобальный поток прямых иностранных инвестиций</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Arkhangelsky, I.Yu. (2019). Antimonopoly Regulation of Foreign Capital in the USA. USA &amp; Canada: Economics, Politics, Culture, 2(590), 57-74. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Butorina, O.V. (2013). European Union after the crisis: decline or renaissance? MGIMO Review of International Relations, 4(31), 71-81. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Butorina, O.V. (2017). Negative and Positive Objectives of the European Monetary Union. Contemporary Europe, 2(74), 18-29. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Davydov, A.Y. (2017). The United States and the World Financial Flows. USA &amp; Canada: Economics, Politics, Culture, 7(571), 26-41. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>González, A. (2019). U.S. - EU Trade and Economic Issues. Congressional Research Service (p. 2). Kondratyeva, N.B. (2017). The fate of the negotiations on the Transatlantic trade and investment partnership EU - USA. Contemporary Europe, 1(73), 138-143. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Kondratyeva, N.B. (2017). The U.S. - EU Transatlantic Partnership: prospects. World Economy and International Relations, 61(8), 5-13. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>7 Wight House. Two Years On, Tax Cuts Continue Boosting the United States Economy. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/articles/two-years-tax-cuts-continue-boosting-unitedstates-economy/ (accessed: 25.12.2019).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Konovalova, Yu.A., &amp; Ushanov, S.A. (2019) US - EU merchandise trade: key features and problem of disproportion. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research: Fourth International Conference on Economic and Business Management (FEBM 2019), 106, 6-10.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Petrovskaya, N.E. (2019). Employment problems in the XXI century: global trends and national characteristics (U.S. experience) (p. 191). Moscow: Infra-M Publ. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Prikhodko, O.V. (2017). The U.S. and Europe: Responding to New Challenges. Canada: Economics, Politics, Culture, 5(569), 5-22. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Prikhodko, O.V. (2018). The Donald Trump Foreign Policy and Europe Allies. Russia and America in the 21 Century, (2), 7. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Prikhodko, O.V. (2019). Trump’s Euro-Atlantic policy: main features of the current agenda. USA &amp; Canada: Economics, Politics, Culture, 49(11), 5-19. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Schneider-Petsinger, M. (2019). US - EU Trade Relations in the Trump Era Which Way Forward? Research paper (p. 30). The Royal Institute of International Affairs.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Shayerah, I.A. (2008). U.S. International trade: trends and forecasts (p. 29). Library of Congress of Washington DC Congressional Research Service.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Supyan, V.B. (2019). R &amp; D in the USA: Funding, Structure and Results. The Journal of the New Economic Association, 1(41), 201-207. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Supyan, V.B. (2019). The State and Economy: D. Trump’s Version. USA &amp; Canada: Economics, Politics, Culture, 49(5), 5-21. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Zimenkov, R.I. (2019). The Practice of Outsourcing by American Corporations. USA &amp; Canada: Economics, Politics, Culture, 49(6), 54-80. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
