<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">RUDN Journal of Economics</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">RUDN Journal of Economics</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Экономика</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2313-2329</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2408-8986</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">23411</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22363/2313-2329-2019-27-4-743-752</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ECONOMIC GROWTH AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКИЙ РОСТ И СОЦИАЛЬНО-ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКОЕ РАЗВИТИЕ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">The path of catching and the path of innovative development: what will Russia choose?</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Путь «наверстывания» и путь инновационного развития: каков будет выбор России?</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Zavyalova</surname><given-names>Elena B.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Завьялова</surname><given-names>Елена Борисовна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>PhD, Head of the Economic Policy and State-Individual Partnership Department</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>кандидат экономических наук, заведующая кафедрой экономической политики и государственно-частного партнерства</p></bio><email>e.zavyalova@inno.mgimo.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Shumskaia</surname><given-names>Ekaterina I.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Шумская</surname><given-names>Екатерина Игоревна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>PhD, leading lecturer of the Economic Policy and State-Individual Partnership Department</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>старший преподаватель кафедры экономической политики и государственно-частного партнерства</p></bio><email>shumskaia_mgimo@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">MGIMO University</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Московский государственный институт международных отношений (университет) МИД России</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2019-12-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>12</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>27</volume><issue>4</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">VOL 27, NO4 (2019)</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">ТОМ 27, №4 (2019)</issue-title><fpage>743</fpage><lpage>752</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2020-04-08"><day>08</day><month>04</month><year>2020</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2019, Zavyalova E.B., Shumskaia E.I.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2019, Завьялова Е.Б., Шумская Е.И.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2019</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Zavyalova E.B., Shumskaia E.I.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Завьялова Е.Б., Шумская Е.И.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rudn.ru/economics/article/view/23411">https://journals.rudn.ru/economics/article/view/23411</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Over the past half century, global GDP growth has been exceptionally rapid, helped by significant labor force growth and increased labor productivity. Employment growth from 1964 to 2014 decreased from 1.7 to 0.3 % per year. Over the past 20 years, overall productivity growth in OECD countries has also slowed significantly. However, the introduction of digital technology is already changing the picture for the better in developed countries. Therefore, achieving the desired economic growth is seen in increasing labor productivity through the active development and implementation of key technologies of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, but with the need to effectively redistribute existing resources within countries, both developed and developing. As a hypothesis, the thesis was put forward on the need for scientific and technological development as the main answer to the challenges of our time with the aim of further growth and development of the Russian economy. However, the study proved that in modern conditions the main solution for Russia is a more efficient distribution of existing factors of production and, as a result, economic activity. At the same time, further technological and innovative development is necessary from the point of view of long-term economic growth, since the catch-up path has its own logical limit.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Последние полвека рост мирового ВВП был исключительно быстрым, чему способствовал значительный рост рабочей силы и рост производительности труда. Рост занятости в период с 1964 по 2014 год снизился с 1,7 до 0,3 % в год. За последние 20 лет общий рост производительности в странах ОЭСР также значительно замедлился. Тем не менее внедрение цифровых технологий уже меняет картину в лучшую сторону в развитых странах. Потому достижение желаемого роста экономики видится в повышении производительности труда за счет активной разработки и внедрения ключевых технологий четвертой промышленной революции, но с необходимостью эффективного перераспределения уже имеющихся ресурсов внутри стран, как развитых, так развивающихся. В качестве гипотезы был выдвинут тезис о необходимости научно-технологического развития как главного ответа на вызовы современности с целью дальнейшего роста и развития российской экономики. Однако в ходе исследования было доказано, что в современных условиях главным решением для России является более эффективное распределение существующих факторов производства и, как следствие, экономической активности. При этом дальнейшее технологическое и инновационное развитие необходимо с точки зрения долгосрочного экономического роста, так как у пути «наверстывания» есть свой логический предел.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>labor productivity</kwd><kwd>technological development</kwd><kwd>scientific and technological progress</kwd><kwd>Fourth Industrial Revolution</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>производительность труда</kwd><kwd>технологическое развитие</kwd><kwd>научнотехнологический прогресс</kwd><kwd>четвертая промышленная революция</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Aghion, P., Bloom, N., Blundell, R., Griffith, R., &amp; Howit P. (2005, May). Competition and Innovation: An Inverted-U Relationship. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(2), 701–728.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Иванов О.В. О некоторых инструментах финансовой поддержки ГЧП-проектов в мировой практике: рекомендации для России // Экономика и управление: проблемы, решения. 2018. № 5. С. 74-84.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Andrews, D., Criscuolo, C., &amp; Gal, P. (2016). The Best versus the Rest: The Global Productivity Slowdown, Divergence across Firms and the Role of Public Policy. OECD Pro- ductivity Working Papers. No. 5 (p. 3). Paris.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Пичков О.Б. Влияние процессов цифровой трансформации на мировую экономику // Международные экономические отношения: реалии, вызовы и перспективы: монография / под общ. ред. и с предисл. Л.С. Ревенкою. М.: МГИМО-Университет, 2019. С. 60-68.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Aptecman, A. (2017). Digital Russia: A new reality (p. 43). McKinsey Digital.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Aghion P., Bloom N., Blundell R., Griffith R., Howit P. Competition and Innovation: An Inverted-U Relationship // The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2005, May. Vol. 120. No. 2. Pp. 701-728.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Balaji, A. (2018). How predictive analytics can boost product development (p. 5). McKinsey &amp; Company.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Andrews D., Criscuolo C., Gal P. The Best versus the Rest: The Global Productivity Slowdown, Divergence across Firms and the Role of Public Policy // OECD Productivity Working Papers. No. 5. Paris, 2016. P. 3.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Berlingieri, G. et al. (2018). Last but not least: laggard firms, technology diffusion and its structural and policy determinants (p. 10). OECD Directorate for Science, Technology and Innovation.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Aptecman A. Digital Russia: A new reality. McKinsey Digital, 2017. P. 43.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bessen, J. (2015). Learning By Doing: The Real Connection Between Innovation, Wages and Wealth. New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Balaji A. How predictive analytics can boost product development. McKinsey &amp; Company, 2018. P. 5.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Brynjolfsson, E., &amp; McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies (p. 5). W.W. Norton.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Berlingieri G. et al. Last but not least: laggard firms, technology diffusion and its structural and policy determinants / OECD Directorate for Science, Technology and Innovation. P. 10.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Comin, D., &amp; Hobijn, В. (2010). An Exploration of Technology Diffusion. American Econo- mic Review, 100, 2031–2060.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bessen J. Learning By Doing: The Real Connection Between Innovation, Wages and Wealth. New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press, 2015.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">David, P.A. (1990). The dynamo and the computer: An historical perspective on the modern productivity paradox. American Economic Review, 80(2), 355–361.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Brynjolfsson E., McAfee A. The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. W.W. Norton, 2014. P. 5.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dobbs, R. (2015). Global growth: Can productivity save the day in an aging world? (p. 60). McKinsey Global Institute.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Comin D., Hobijn В. An Exploration of Technology Diffusion // American Economic Review. 2010. Vol. 100. Pp. 2031-2060.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gal, P. (2019). Digitalisation and productivity: In search of the holy grail. OECD Economics Department Working Papers. No. 1533 (p. 4).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">David P.A. The dynamo and the computer: An historical perspective on the modern productivity paradox // American Economic Review. 1990. Vol. 80. No. 2. Pp. 355-361.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ivanova, O.V. (2018). O nekotoryh instrumentah finansovoj podderzhki GChP-proektov v mirovoj praktike: rekomendacii dlja Rossii [On some tools of financial support of public – private partnership projects in world practice: recommendations for Russia]. Economics and management: problems and solutions (p. 5). (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dobbs R. Global growth: Can productivity save the day in an aging world? McKinsey Global Institute, 2015. P. 60.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pichkov, O.B. (2019). Vlijanie processov cifrovoj transformacii na mirovuju jekonomiku [International economic relations: reality, challenges and projects]. MGIMO University. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gal P. Digitalisation and productivity: In search of the holy grail // OECD Economics Department Working Papers. No. 1533. OECD, 2019. P. 4.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rodrik, D. (2018). New technologies, global value chains, and developing economies (p. 13). National Bureau of Economic Research.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rodrik D. New technologies, global value chains, and developing economies / National Bureau of economic research. 2018. P. 13.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sorbe, S., Gal, P., Nicoletti, G., &amp; Timiliotis C. (2019). Digital dividend: policies to harness the productivity potential of digital technologies. Economic Policy Paper No. 26 (p. 7). OECD.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sorbe S., Gal P., Nicoletti G., Timiliotis C. Digital dividend: policies to harness the productivity potential of digital technologies // Economic Policy Paper No. 26. OECD, 2019. P. 7.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Syverson, C. (2013). Will history repeat itself? Comments on ‘Is the Information Technology Revolution Over?’ International Productivity Monitor, 25, 20–36.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Syverson C. Will history repeat itself? Comments on ‘Is the Information Technology Revolution Over?’ // International Productivity Monitor. 2013. Vol. 25. Pp. 20-36.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Aljarboua, Z., Santhanam, N., Teulieres, M., Thomsen, J., &amp; Tilley, J. (2019). Industrial robo- tics: Oppor-tunities for manufacturers of end effectors (p. 5.). McKinsey &amp; Company.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Aljarboua Z., Santhanam N., Teulieres M., Thomsen J., Tilley J. Industrial robotics: Opportunities for manufacturers of end effectors. McKinsey &amp; Company, 2019. P. 5.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list></back></article>
