ACCURACY EVALUATIONOF THE NONLINEAR STATIC ANALYSIS METHOD OF THE STRUCTURES SEISMIC RESISTANCE

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The article considers the practical application of a technique of nonlinear static analysis of seismic resistance of buildings and structures. The calculation of one-storey steel frame, by nonlinear static and nonlinear dynamic methodsis fulfiled. As a result of analysis of the calcu- lation, results show the importance of higher vibration modes and the need to analyze their effects on the system response

About the authors

G A DZHINCHVELASHVILI

Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University)

Author for correspondence.
Email: guram2004@yandex.ru

д.т.н., профессор

129337, Moscow, Russia

S V BULUSHEV

Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University)

Email: sergey.bulushev@gmail.com

инженер

129337, Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Dzhinchvelashvili G.A., Bulushev S.V., Kolesnikov A.V. Nelinejnyj staticheskij metod analiza sejsmostojkosti zdanij i sooruzhenij. Earthquake engineering constructions safety. 2016, No 5. P. 39 — 47.
  2. Dzhinchvelashvili G.A. Nelinejnye dinamicheskie metody rascheta zda-nij i sooruzhenij s zadannoj obespechennost'ju sejsmostojkosti. Avtoreferat diss. na soiskanie uchenoj stepeni dokt. tehn. nauk. – M.: MGSU, 2015. – 46 p.
  3. Zadojan P.M. Ocenka sejsmostojkosti metodom spektra nesushhej sposobnosti. Izvestija Erevanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta arhitektury i stroitel'stva, 2/2009.
  4. Mkrtychev O.V., Dzhinchvelashvili G.A. Problemy ucheta nelinejnostej v teorii sejsmostojkosti (gipotezy i zabluzhdenija) // Moskva: MGSU, 2012. (Biblioteka nauchnyh razrabotok i proektov MGSU). - 192 p.
  5. Mkrtychev O.V., Dzhinchvelashvili G.A., Dzerzhinskij R.I. Filosofija mnogourovnevogo proektirovanija v svete obespechenija sejsmostojkosti sooruzhenij. Geologija i geofizika Juga Rossii. 2016. No 1. P. 71 — 81.
  6. Mkrtychev O.V., Dzhinchvelashvili G.A. Ocenka raboty zdanij i sooruzhenij za predelami uprugosti pri sejsmicheskih vozdejstvijah. XXI Russian-Slovak-Polish Seminar, “Theoretical Foundation of Civil Engineering”, Moscow-Archangelsk 03.07 – 06.07.2012. P. 177 —186.
  7. Nemchinov Ju.I., Mar'enkov N.G., Havkin A.K., Babik K.N. Proektirovanie zdanij s zadannym urovnem obespechenija sejsmostojkosti (s uchetom rekomendacij EVROKODA 8, mezhdunarodnyh standartov i trebovanij DBN): monografija/ - Kiev: Minregion Ukrainy, GP NIISK. 2012. 53 p.
  8. Sosnin A.V. Ob osobennostjah metodologii nelinejnogo staticheskogo analiza i ego soglasovannosti s bazovoj normativnoj metodikoj rascheta zdanij i sooruzhenij na dejstvie sejsmicheskih sil. Bulletin of the South Ural University. Ser. Construction Engineering and Architecture. 2016, vol. 16, No 1. P. 12 — 19.
  9. SP 14.13330.2014. «Stroitel'stvo v sejsmicheskih rajonah. Aktualizirovannaja redakcija SNiP II-7-81*», M., 2014;
  10. Applied Technology Council (ATC). «Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings». Rep. No. ATC-40, Volumes 1 and 2, Redwood City, CA, 1996.
  11. Applied Technology Council (ATC). «Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures». Rep. No. ATC-55, Redwood City, CA, 2005.
  12. Building Seismic Safety Council. NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, FEMA-273, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, 1997.
  13. Chopra A.K. Capacity-demand diagram methods based on inelastic design spectrum/ Chopra A.K., Goel R.K. // Proceedings of 12 World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand, 2000: - paper №1612.
  14. Clough R.W., Penzien J. Dynamics of Structures (Third Edition). - Computers & Structures, Inc. 1995 University Ave., Berkeley, CA 94704, USA. 752 p.
  15. Datta T.K. Seismic Analysis of Structures, John Wiley & Sons (Asia) Pte Ltd. 2010. – p. 464.
  16. European Standard. Eurocode-Basis of structural design: EN 1990: 2002(E). – April, 2002. – 87 p.
  17. FEMA 273. Federal Emergency Management Agency. NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Washington, D.C. – October, 1997.
  18. FEMA-274. Federal Emergency Management Agency. NEHRP Commentary on the Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Washington, D.C. – October, 1997.
  19. FEMA 356. Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Washington, D.C. – November, 2000.
  20. Fajfar P., Krawinkler H. (2004), ‘Performance-Based Seismic Design Concepts and Implementation - Proceedings of the International Workshop Bled, Slovenia, June 28 - July 1, 2004. PEER Report 2004/05, College of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley.
  21. Gupta B., (1998) ‘Enhanced pushover procedure and inelastic demand estimation for performance-based seismic evaluation of buildings’, Ph.D. Dissertation, Orlando, Florida, University of Central Florida.
  22. Mkrtychev O.V., Dzhinchvelashvili G.A., Busalova M.S. Calculation accelerograms parameters for a ”Construction-Basis” model, nonlinear properties of the soil taken into account / Procedia Engineering –2014 - vol.91. P. 54 — 57.
  23. NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and other Structures. Part 1: 1997 Edition. Building Seismic Safety Council (USA), - 342 p.
  24. Paz M. Structural Dynamics: Theory and Computation / by Mario Paz, Wil-liam Leigh. – 5th ed., 2004. – 844 p.
  25. Themelis S. Pushover analysis for seismic assessment and design of structures, Heriot-Watt University, School of Built Enviroment, 2008.

Copyright (c) 2017 ДЖИНЧВЕЛАШВИЛИ Г.А., БУЛУШЕВ С.В.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies