Mutual images of Poland and Belarus in the travel photo structure

Cover Page

Abstract


One of the key aspects of contemporary society is intercultural communication that is important mainly due to the relations with such trends in the development of an open society as the erasure of boundaries, visualization, virtualization, and massification of social life. Self-organized travel as one of the forms of tourism is a combination of social practices that implement interaction of various types of everyday life (one’s own and others’). In various disciplinary fields, including sociology, throughout the twentieth century, everyday life was always in the focus of interdisciplinary research. However, the question of how signs and reality are connected in the daily interactions of the traveler was not considered separately. The article presents the results of an interdisciplinary research based on the analysis of travel representations posted on the tourist Internet forums and on the methods of semiotic and structural analysis to characterize the ways of constructing mutual images of Poland and Belarus. The structure of these visual images is analyzed in several perspectives: new and social-typical values and interpretations; expressive signs; type and genre of representations; their general characteristics and differences; social norms and lifestyle; city and nature; past and present; holidays and weekdays. The study revealed substantial and structural originality of the everyday life images reproduced in travel representations: the image of Belarus presented by Polish travelers is based on various combinations of relations between the signs “countryside”, “simple life”, “preservation of traditions”, “quiet lifestyle’; Belarusian travelers construct visual images of Poland based on the interconnected ideas of “urban lifestyle”, “modern and old city”, “preservation of historical objects”.


About the authors

T V Burak

Belarusian State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: taburak@mail.ru
Kalvariyskaya St., 9, Minsk, Belarus, 220004

References

  1. Barthes R. Camera lucida. Kommentariy k fotografii [Camera lucida. Comment on the Photo]. Per., komm. i poslesl. M.K. Ryklina. Moscow; 2011 (In Russ.).
  2. Bataeva E.V. Gendernaja vizualnost sovremennoj reklamy [Gender visuality of contemporary advertising]. Sociology: Theory, Methods, Marketing. 2010; 3 (In Russ.).
  3. Bauman Z. Ot palomnika k turistu [From pilgrim to tourist]. Sociological Journal. 1995; 4 (In Russ.).
  4. Baudrillard J. Simulyakry i simulyatsiya [Simulacra and Simulation]. Moscow; 2015 (In Russ.).
  5. Bourdieu P., Boltanski L., Castel R., Chamboredon J.-C. Obshchedostupnoe iskusstvo. Opyt o sotsialnom ispolzovanii fotografii [Public Art. On the Social Use of Photography]. Per. s frants. B.M. Skuratova; poslesl. A.T. Bikbova. Moscow; 2014 (In Russ.).
  6. Wittgenstein L. Logiko-filosofsky traktat [Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus]. Moscow; 2010 (In Russ.).
  7. Garfinkel H., Sacks H. O formalnykh strukturakh prakticheskikh deystvy [On formal structures of practical action]. http://lib.socio.msu.ru/l/library?e=d-000-00---0klass--00-0-0-00prompt-10 (In Russ.).
  8. Goffman E. Analiz freymov. Esse ob organizatsii povsednevnogo opyta [Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience]. Moscow; 2004 (In Russ.).
  9. Dashkova T. Telesnost-ideologia-kinematograf. Vizualny kanon i sovetskaja povsednevnost [Physicality-Ideology-Cinema. Visual Canon and Soviet Everyday Life]. Moscow; 2013 (In Russ.).
  10. Debord G-E. Obshchestvo spektaklya [The Society of the Spectacle]. Moscow; 2000 (In Russ.).
  11. Zamyatin D.N. Obrazy puteschestviy: socialnoe osvoenie prostranstva [Travel images: Social exploration of space]. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya. 2002; 2 (In Russ.).
  12. Ilyinykh S.A., Tabarkov A.V. Gorodskoe prostranstvo: spetsifika upravleniya [Urban space: Specifics of management]. Teoriya i Praktika Obshchestvennogo Razvitiya. 2015; 13 (In Russ.).
  13. Lotman Yu.M. Semiosphere. Saint Petersburg; 2010 (In Russ.).
  14. McLuhan M. Ponimanie media: Vneshnie rasshireniya cheloveka [Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man]. Moscow; 2014 (In Russ.).
  15. Austin J. Kak proizvodit deystviya pri pomoshchi slov. Smysl i sensibilii [How to Do Things with Words. Sense and Sensibilia]. Per. s angl. V.P. Rudneva, L.B. Makeevoy. Moscow; 1999 (In Russ.).
  16. Sapir E. Bessoznatelnye stereotipy povedeniya v obshchestve [The unconscious patterning of behavior in society]. Isbrannye trudy po jazykoznaniju i kulturologii. Moscow; 2002 (In Russ.).
  17. Searle J. Chto takoe rechevoy akt? [What is a speech act?]. Novoe v zarubezhnoy lingvistike. 1986; 17 (In Russ.).
  18. Schütz A. O mnozhestvennosti realnostey [On multiple realities]. Sotsiologicheskoe Obozrenie. 2003; 3 (2) (In Russ.).
  19. Eco U. Otsutstvuyushchaya struktura. Vvedenie v semiologiyu [The Absent Structure. Introduction to Semiotics]. Saint Petersburg; 2006 (In Russ.).
  20. Bohnsack R. The interpretation of pictures and the documentary method. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung. 2008; 9 (3).
  21. Cohen E. A phenomenology of tourist experiences. Sociology. 1979; 13 (2).
  22. Hitzler R. Sinnrekonstruktion. Zum Stand der Diskussion (in) der deutschsprachigen interpretativen Soziologie. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung. 2002; 3 (2).
  23. Knoblauch H., Baer A., Laurier E., Petschke S., Schnettler B. Visuelle Analyse. Neue Entwicklungen in der interpretativen Analyse von Video und Fotografie. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung. 2008; 9 (3).
  24. Luckmann T. Some remarks on scores in multimodal sequential analysis. Knoblauch H. et al. Video Analysis: Methodology and Methods. Qualitative Audiovisual Data Analysis in Sociology. Frankfurt am Main; 2006.
  25. Luhmann N. Gesellschaftsstruktur und Semantik. Studien zur Wissenssoziologie der modernen Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main; 1995.
  26. Podemski K. Socjologia podróży. Poznań; 2004.
  27. Schegloff E. On some gestures’ relation to talk. J.M. Atkinson, J.S. Heritage (Eds.) Structures of social action. Cambridge; 1984.
  28. Soeffner H.-G., Hitzler R. Hermeneutik als Haltung und Handlung. Schröer N. (Hrsg.) Interpretative Sozialforschung. Auf dem Wege zu einer hermeneutischen Wissenssoziologie. Opladen; 1994.
  29. Sztompka P. Socjologia wizualna. Fotografia jako metoda badawcza. Warszawa; 2005.

Statistics

Views

Abstract - 505

PDF (Russian) - 298

Cited-By


PlumX

Dimensions


Copyright (c) 2019 Burak T.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies