Professional deformations in socionic professions

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

The article considers social factors of professional deformation in socionomic professions. This is an important sociological issue due to the risks of professional deformation for customers and social environment, thus, there is a need for a set of measures for the timely diagnostics and prevention of such deviations. The authors support the interpretation of the profession as an “institutionalized deviation”, and of the professional as a person licensed to deviate from the philistine behavior and thinking; consider professional deformation from the point of view of professionalization (institutional and personal) and combine psychological and sociological approaches. The combination of the neo-Weberian approach, secondary analysis and in-depth interviews allowed the authors to identify the following factors of professional deformation in socionomic professions: discrepancy of the individual concept and model of professional career; unproductive resolution of professional crises during professionalization; formation of the public image of the professional group, its ideology and ethics as opposing the idea of serving its own interests and getting professional privileges; creation of professional organizations (associations) with the features of social-professional disadaptation (for example, the syndrome of professional burnout); social closure of the professional community as a source of considering professionalism an instrument of access to privileges and double standards; increasing distance in the activities of the professional (professional ‘deafness’, sociolect for hiding the reported meanings); bureaucratization (regulation of professional activity contrary to the clients’ interests, best practices, and work schedule); value-role conflicts. These factors are ambivalent: on the one hand, they are signs of the institutionalization of the profession; on the other hand, they are indicators of social deformation.

About the authors

L V Temnova

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: temnova.larisa@yandex.ru

доктор психологических наук, профессор кафедры современной социологии Московского государственного университета имени М.В. Ломоносова

Leninskie Gory, 1, Moscow, 119991, Russia

N S Faiman

Institute of Social-Economic Studies of Population of RAS

Email: nataliafaymann@gmail.com

аспирант Института социально-экономических проблем народонаселения Российской академии наук

Nakhimovsky Prosp., 32, Moscow, 117218, Russia

References

  1. Antonova N.L. Kachestvo meditsinskogo obsluzhivaniya v sisteme obyazatelnogo meditsinskogo strahovaniya kak sotsiologicheskaya problema [Quality of medical care in the system of compulsory health insurance as a sociological problem]. Izvestiya Uralskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. 2007; 51 (In Russ.).
  2. Beznosov S.P. Professionalnaya deformatsiya lichnosti [Professional Deformation of Personality]. Saint Petersburg; 2004 (In Russ.).
  3. Bondarev A.A. Professionalnoe pravosoznanie gosudarstvennyh i municipalnyh sluzhashchih [Professional Legal Consciousness of State and Municipal Employees]: Diss. k.yu.n. Moscow; 2000 (In Russ.).
  4. Bourdieu P. Prakticheskij smysl [Practical Sense]. Saint Petersburg; 2001 (In Russ.).
  5. Volkov V.V., Dmitrieva A.V., Pozdnyakov M.L., Titaev K.D. Rossijskie sudii kak professionalnaya gruppa: sociologicheskoe issledovanie [Russian Judges as a Professional Group: A Sociological Study]. Saint Petersburg; 2012 (In Russ.).
  6. Volchansky M.E. Sociologiya konflikta v medicine [Sociology of Conflict in Medicine]: Diss. k.s.n. Volgograd; 2008 (In Russ.).
  7. Goffman E. Poryadok vzaimodejstviya [The interaction order]. Sociologiya Vlasti. 2014; 1 (In Russ.).
  8. Goffman E. Predstavlenie sebya drugim v povsednevnoj zhizni [The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life]. Moscow; 2000 (In Russ.).
  9. Derevleva N.V., Yablonskaya O.Yu. Problema ispolzovaniya meditsinskogo slenga v professionalnom obschenii [The problem of using medical slang in professional communication]. Zhurnal GrGMU. 2011; 2 (In Russ.).
  10. Druzhilov S.A. Individualny resurs cheloveka kak osnova stanovleniya professionalizma [Individual Human Resource as the Basis for the Development of Professionalism]. Voronezh; 2010 (In Russ.).
  11. Durkheim E. O razdelenii obschestvennogo truda [The Division of Labour in Society]. Moscow; 1996 (In Russ.).
  12. Zeer E.F. Psihologiya professij [Psychology of Professions]. Moscow—Ekaterinburg; 2003 (In Russ.).
  13. Zelizer V. Chelovecheskie tsennosti i rynok: strahovanie zhizni i smert v Amerike XIX veka [Human values and the market: The case of life insurance and death in 19-th century America]. Ekonomicheskaya Sociologiya. 2010; 11 (2) (In Russ.).
  14. Kottsova E.E. Professionalnaya leksika medicinskih rabotnikov g. Arhangelska v nominativno-tematicheskom aspekte [Professional vocabulary of medical workers of Arkhangelsk in the nominative-thematic perspective]. Vestnik NNGU. 2013; 6-2 (In Russ.).
  15. Mansurov V.A. Sociologiya professij. Istoriya, metodologiya i praktika issledovanij [Sociology of professions. History, methodology, and research]. Sociologicheskie Issledovaniya. 2009; 8 (In Russ.).
  16. Markova A.K. Psihologiya professionalizma [Psychology of Professionalism]. Moscow; 1996 (In Russ.).
  17. Martyanova N.A. Transformatsiya professionalnoj etiki v epohu postmoderna [Transformation of professional ethics in the postmodern era]. Gramota. 2013; 10. Ch. II (In Russ.).
  18. Nevzorova M.S. Nestandartnaya leksika v professionalnom obschenii medikov [Non-standard vocabulary in the professional communication of doctors]. Vestnik VolGU. Seriya 2: Yazykoznanie. 2012; 2 (In Russ.).
  19. Nikolaev V.G. Sociologiya zanyatij i professij Everetta Hughesa: Zabyty intellektualny resurs [Everett Hughes’ sociology of occupations and professions: A forgotten intellectual resource]. Antropologiya professij: granitsy zanyatosti v epohu nestabilnosti. Moscow; 2012 (In Russ.).
  20. Povarenkov Yu.P. Sistemogeneticheskiy analiz professionalnogo razvitiya lichnosti [System-genetic analysis of the personal professional development]. Organizatsionnaya Psihologiya i Psihologiya Truda. 2017; 2 (4) (In Russ.).
  21. Collins R. Tehnologicheskoe zameshhenie i krizisy kapitalizma: Vyhody i tupiki [Technological displacement and capitalist crises: Escapes and dead ends]. Politicheskaja Kontseptologija. 2010; 1 (In Russ.).
  22. Professionalnaya deformatsiya lichnosti [Professional Deformation of Personality]. Tomsk; 2009 (In Russ.).
  23. Pryazhnikov N.S., Pryazhnikova E.Yu. Psihologiya truda i chelovecheskogo dostoinstva [Psychology of Labor and Human Dignity]. Moscow; 2001 (In Russ.).
  24. Rudenko A.Yu. Vrachi laboratorno-diagnosticheskogo profilya v professionalnoj strukture otechestvennoj meditsiny [Doctors of the laboratory-diagnostic profile in the professional structure of the Russian medicine]. Diss. k.s.n. Volgograd; 2012 (In Russ.).
  25. Semkova M.P. Ritual i vygoranie v subkulture skoroj pomoschi [Ritual and Burnout in the Ambulance Service Subculture]. http://samlib.ru/s/semkowa_m_p/ritualiwygoraniewsubkulx tureskorojpomoshi.shtml (In Russ.).
  26. Sokolov N.Ya. Professionalnoe pravosoznanie yuristov [Professional Legal Consciousness of Lawyers]. Moscow; 1988 (In Russ.).
  27. Sorokin P.A. Obschedostupnyj uchebnik sociologii [Public Textbook of Sociology]. Moscow; 1994 (In Russ.).
  28. Titaev K., Shklyaruk M. Rossijsky sledovatel: prizvanie, professiya, povsednevnost [Russian Investigator: Vocation, Profession, Everyday Life]. Moscow; 2016 (In Russ.).
  29. Filatova O.V. Professionalnaya deyatelnost i socialno-psihologicheskie osobennosti byurokratii [Professional activities and social-psychological features of bureaucracy]. Istoricheskie, Filosofskie, Politicheskie i Yuridicheskie Nauki, Kulturologiya i Iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy Teorii i Praktiki. 2013; 6. Ch. I (In Russ.).
  30. Hughes E.Ch. Professii [Professions]. Antropologiya professij: granitsy zanyatosti v epohu nestabilnosti. Moscow; 2012 (In Russ.).
  31. Shchepanskaya T.B. Sravnitelnaya etnografiya professij: povsednevnye praktiki i kulturnye kody (Rossiya, konets XX — nachalo XXI v.) [Comparative Ethnography of Professions: Everyday Practices and Cultural Codes (Russia, end of the 20th — early 21st century)]. Saint Petersburg; 2010 (In Russ.).
  32. Etzioni A. The Semi-Professionals and Their Organization: Teachers, Nurses and Social Workers. New York; 1969.
  33. Maslach C., Jackson S.E. The measurement of experienced burnout. Journal of Occupational Behavior. 1981; 2.
  34. Parsons T. Some problems confronting sociology as a profession. American Sociological Review. 1959; 24 (4).
  35. Saks M. Professionalization, politics and CAM. Kelner M. et al. (Eds.) Complementary and Alternative Medicine: Challenge and Change. Amsterdam; 2000.
  36. Super D.E. et al. Vocational Development: A Framework of Research. New York; 1957.

Copyright (c) 2019 Temnova L.V., Faiman N.S.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies