MORAL HAZARDS OF PLACING BUDGETARY FUNDS WITH A COMPETITVE BASIS

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

In the article the author considers the conceptual threat of monopoly a competitive basis for the placement of the state order in Russia. Appearance as a result of application of the tender system, the moral hazard in the allocation of public funds to provide a high corruption capacity the implementation of government projects. Often, the company claims to budget money, just about knowing where and how to get the desired result, due to the involvement of the leadership or the future subcontractor of a public authority in the process of placing an order. In this regard, in order of creation liability when the profit from the possibility of order “strangers” means, the author focuses on the necessity to reform the existing system of public procurement. At the same time, there are occurring unstructured latent processes of personalization of responsibility for the realization of several projects of strategic planning level and the need of institutionalization of the so-called operators of large national projects. Deciding this issue by creating state-dominated companies, the author think fit it’s possible to significantly enhance the incentive function of the state order for the national economy, at the same time, going out of moral hazard area during its placement.

About the authors

Denis Nikolaevich Putimtsev

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)

Author for correspondence.
Email: d.finance.unvrs@gmail.com

Senior Lecturer of the Department of Public Administration of the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, RUDN University

6 Miklukho-Maklaya St., Moscow, Russia, 117198

References

  1. Federal’nyj zakon ot 05.04.2013 № 44-FZ (red. ot 07.06.2017) «O kontraktnoj sisteme v sfere zakupok tovarov, rabot, uslug dlja obespechenija gosudarstvennyh i municipal’nyh nuzhd» // Elektronnaja pravovaja spravochnaja sistema «Konsul’tantPljus». URL: http:// www.consultant.ru.
  2. Federal’nyj zakon ot 18.07.2011 № 223-FZ (red. ot 07.06.2017) «O zakupkah tovarov, rabot, uslug otdel’nymi vidami juridicheskih lic» // Elektronnaja pravovaja spravochnaja sistema «Konsul’tantPljus». URL: http://www.consultant.ru.
  3. Bjudzhetnyj kodeks RF ot 31.07.1998 № 145-FZ (red. ot 28.03.2017) // Elektronnaja pravovaja spravochnaja sistema «Konsul’tantPljus». URL: http://www.consultant.ru.
  4. Rasporjazhenie Pravitel’stva RF ot 17.11.2008 № 1662-r «O Koncepcii dolgosrochnogo social’no-jekonomicheskogo razvitija Rossijsko Federacii na period do 2020 goda» // Elektronnaja pravovaja spravochnaja sistema «Konsul’tantPljus». URL: http://www. consultant.ru.
  5. Bar’ery razvitija mehanizma GChP v Rossii / Sovmestnoe issledovanie NPF «Ekspertnyj institut», NP «Centr razvitija gosudarstvenno-chastnogo partnerstva», Nacional’nogo agentstva finansovyh issledovanij pri podderzhke sotrudnikov GU VShJe, Instituta jekonomiki RAN i Finansovogo universiteta pri Pravitel’stve RF. M.; NPF «Jekspertnyj institut», 2010.
  6. Koroli goszakaza – 2016: rejting Forbes // Rossijskaja versija finansovo-jekonomicheskogo izdanija “Forbes”. URL: http://www.forbes.ru/rating-photogallery/313039-koroligoszakaza-2016-reiting-forbes?photo=5.
  7. Promyshlennoe proizvodstvo v Rossii. 2016: Statisticheskij sbornik / Rosstat. M., 2016.

Copyright (c) 2018 Putimtsev D.N.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies