Economic development is not geo-politically uniform. There is a geographic component that leaves some regions within the world or some parts of a country, including the Russian Federation, more economically developed that others. This article examines uneven economic development in the USA as a case study. Specifi cally, this article defi nes what is meant by uneven development, as well as documents the pattern of uneven development in the United States. The article also looks at the causes and consequences of uneven development and discusses some possible remedies. Overall the conclusion is that the USA experiences a signifi cant geographic component to its economic development and it is not clear that the policies it has undertaken, if at all, have been successful to abating, slowing down, or reversing uneven development.

D Schultz
Hamline University St. Paul, Minnesota, USA, 55105

  • Acemoglu, Daron, Simon Johnson, and James A. Robinson. 2001. A The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation.@ American Economic Review. 91: 1369-1401.
  • American Civil Engineering Association. 2017. Infrastructure Report Card. URL: (site last visited on April 15, 2017).
  • Anderson, John E. and Robert W. Wassmer. 2000. Bidding for Business: The Effi cacy of Local Economic Development Incentives in a Metropolitan Area. Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
  • Anon. 2016. ARich Province, Poor Province,@ Economist. October 1, pp. 41-42.
  • Bartik, Timothy J. 1991. Who Benefi ts from State and Local Economic Development Policies? Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
  • Berenson, Alex. 2007. “Tax Breaks Used by Drug Makers Failed to Add Jobs as Advertised.” New York Times (July 24), A1.
  • Boarnet, John, David A. Jaeger, and William T. Bogart. 1996. “Enterprise Zones and Employment: Evidence from New Jersey.” Journal of Urban Economics, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 198-215.
  • Bondonio, Daniele, and John Engberg. 2000. “Enterprise Zones and Local Employment: Evidence from the States’ Programs,” Regional Science & Urban Economics, Vol. 30, No. 5, pp. 519-549.
  • Braudel, Fernand. 1979. Civilization and Capitalism, 3 vols. NY: Harper & Row.
  • California Budget Project. 2006. “New Study Overstates the Effectiveness of Enterprise Zones.” Budget Brief (August).
  • Engberg, J., and R. Greenbaum. 1999. “State enterprise zones and local housing markets,” Journal of Housing Research 10: 163-87.
  • Fisher, Peter S. and Alan Peters. 1997 “Tax and Spending Incentives and Enterprise Zones.” The Effects or State and Local Public Policies on Economic Development Symposium, New England Economic Review (March/April), pp. 109-30.
  • Greenbaum, Robert, and John Engberg. 2004. “The Impact of State Enterprise Zones on Urban Manufacturing Establishments,” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 315-339.
  • Hanley, Caroline. 2011. International Journal of Sociology, vol. 40, no. 4, Winter 2010-2011, pp. 6-30.
  • Harris, Donald J. 2007. A Uneven Development.@ The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd edition, London: Macmillan.
  • Harvey, David. 2007. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Hissong, Rod. 2003. “The Efficacy of Local Economic Development Incentives.” In Sammis B. White, Richard D. Bingham, and Edward W. Hill (eds), Financing Economic Development in the 21st Century. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, pp. 131-144.
  • Holoviak, Paula A. and Damian Carabello. 2008. An Evaluation of the Keystone Opportunity Zone (KOZ) and Keystone Opportunity Expansion Zone (KOEZ) Programs in Rural Pennsylvania. URL: (Site last visited on April 16, 2017).
  • Holzer, Harry. 2011. A Very Uneven Road: US Labor Markets in the Past 30 Years. URL: (site last visited on April 16, 2017).
  • Housing and Urban Development. 2001. Interim Assessment of Empowerment Zones and Enterprise Communities (EC/EZ) Program: A Progress Report. Washington, DC: Department of Housing and Urban Development.
  • Jargowsky, Paul. “Ghetto Poverty among Blacks in the 1980s,” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 13 (Winter): 288-310.
  • Kieschnick, Michael. 1995. “The Effect of State and Local Taxes on Economic Development: A Meta-analysis.” URL:…-a017478992 (Site last visited June 12, 2012).
  • Kim, Sukkoo. 1995. Expansion of Markets and the Geographic Distribution of Economic Activities: The Trends in U.S. Regional Manufacturing Structure, 1860-1987. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110 (4): 881-908.
  • Kim, Sukkoo. 1999. Regions, Resources and Economic Geography: The Sources of U.S. Regional Comparative Advantage, 1880B1987.@ Regional Science and Urban Economics 29: 1-32.
  • Kim, Sukkoo. 2000. Urban Development in the United States, 1690-1990. Southern Economic Journal 66: 855-80.
  • Kim, Sukkoo. 2006. Division of Labor and the Rise of Cities: Evidence from U.S. Industrialization, 1850-1880. Journal of Economic Geography 6: 469-91.
  • Kim, Sukkoo. 2007 Changes in the Nature of Urban Spatial Structures in the United States, 1890-2000. Journal of Regional Science 47: 273-87.
  • Kim, Sukkoo. 1998. Economic Integration and Convergence: U.S. Regions, 1840-1990. Journal of Economic History 58: 659-83.
  • Kim, Sukoo. 2008. Spatial Inequality and Economic Development: Theories, Facts, and Policies. Washington, D.C. The World Bank.
  • Kolko, Jed and David Neumark. 2009. Do California’s Enterprise Zones Create Jobs? San Francisco, CA: Public Policy Institute of California.
  • Krugman, Paul. 1991. Increasing Returns and Economic Geography. Journal of Political Economy 99: 483-99.
  • Krugman, Paul. 1991. Geography and Trade. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Kucheva, Yana Andreeva. 2011. Subsidized Housing and the Concentration of Poverty, 1977-2008: A Comparison between Eight US Cities Los Angeles: California Center for Population Research.
  • Kuznets, S. 1966. Modern Economic Growth, Rate, Structure, and Spread. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Kyrylych, Khrystyna. 2006. Problem of Uneven Economic Development of the World Economy: Essence and Causes. Intelektin Ekonomika. Vol. 7, No. 3(17), pp. 344-354.
  • LeRoy, Greg. 2005. The Great American Jobs Scam: Corporate Tax Dodging and the Myth of Job Creation. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
  • Lichter, Daniel T., and Kenneth Johnson. 2007. Concentrated poverty in rural areas: The Changing Spatial Concentration of America=s Rural Poor Population, Rural Sociology 72(3), pp. 331-358.
  • Lichter, Daniel T., Domenico Parisi, and Michael C. Taquino. 2012. The Geography of Exclusion: Race, Segregation, and Concentrated Poverty, Social Problems, Vol. 59, Issue 3, pp. 364-388.
  • Lobao, Linda M. Gregory Hooks & Ann R. Tickamyer. 2007. Advancing the Sociology of Spatial Inequality, in The Sociology of Spatial Inequality 1-3, Linda M. Lobao et al. eds., SUNY Press.
  • Malizia, Emil E. and Edward J. Feser. 1999. Understanding Local Economic Development. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research.
  • Markusen, Ann and Amanda Johnson. 2006. Artists’ Centers: Evolution and Impact on Careers, Neighborhoods, and Economies. Minneapolis, MN: Project on Regional and Industrial Economics, University of Minnesota: Part I.
  • Mattera, Phillip, et al. 2011. Money for Something: Job Creation and Job Quality Standards in State Economic Development Subsidy Programs. URL: http://www.goodjobsfi (Site last visited on April 15, 2017).
  • Mitchener, Kris, and Ian McLean. 2003. AThe Productivity of U.S. States Since 1880. Journal of Economic Growth 8: 73-114.
  • Moore, Barrington, Jr. 1966. Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World. Boston: Beacon Press.
  • Peters, Alan and Peter Fisher. 2003. “Enterprise Zones: How Effective Are They?” In Sammis B. White, Richard D. Bingham, and Edward W. Hill (eds), Financing Economic Development in the 21st Century. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, pp. 113-130.
  • Peters, David J. 2012. AIncome Inequality across Micro and Meso Geographic Scales in the Midwestern United States, 1979-2009, Rural Sociology 77(2), pp. 171-202.
  • Piketty, Thomas. 2014. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
  • Plant, Raymond. 2009. The Neo-Liberal State. NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Porter, Michael. 2000. “Location, Competition, and Economic Development: Local Clusters in a Global Economy,” Economic Development Quarterly, vol 14, no.1, pp. 15-34.
  • Porter, M. E. 1998. “Clusters and the new economics of competition,” Harvard Business Review, Nov/Dec98, Vol. 76 Issue 6, p. 77.
  • Schmenner, Roger W. 1982. Making Business Location Decisions. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Snell, Ronald. 1998. A Review of State Economic Development Policy. Denver, CO: National Council of State Legislatures.
  • Tiebout, Charles. 1956. “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures”. Journal of Political Economy. 64 (5): 416-424.
  • Tomaskovic-Devey, Donald and Vincent J. Roscigno. 1997. Uneven Development and Local Inequality in the U.S. South: The Role of Outside Investment, Landed Elites, and Racial Dynamics. Sociological Forum, vol. 12, no. 4.
  • Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1976. The Modern World System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. New York: Academic Press.
  • Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1979. The Capitalist World-Economy. NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wasylenko, Michael. 1997. “Taxation and Economic Development: The State of the Economic Literature.” State Tax Notes (June 23), pp. 1883-1895.
  • White, Sammis B., Richard D. Bingham, and Edward W. Hill. 2003. Financing Economic Development in the 21st Century. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
  • Wilson, William Julius. 1996. When Work Disappears: The World of the New Urban Poor New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
  • Wilson, William Julius. 2009. The Political and Economic Forces Shaping Concentrated Poverty, Political Science Quarterly Volume 123 Number 4, pp. 555-571.
  • Wu, JunJie, and Munisamy Gopinath. 2008. What Causes Spatial Variations in Economic Development in the United States?@ American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 90 (2) (May 2008): 392-408.


Abstract - 63

PDF (English) - 41

Copyright (c) 2017 Schultz D.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.