The Impact of a Creolized Text Non-verbal and Verbal Parts on its Perception (an Experimental Study)

Cover Page


The paper analyzes the impact of creolized text verbal and non-verbal parts on the perception of its meaning. The perception facreolized text is dualistic: the non-verbal part (image) is identified with visual recollection images while the verbal part (text) is identified with verbal models reflecting nonlingual consciousness images as well. The perception of acreolized text perception was analyzed with Osgood’s semantic differential method which enables the identification of sense perception results involving both genetically translated conscious images (images of color) and conscious images developed in one’s culture acquisition. The applied method reveals denotative as well as axiological characteristics of creolized text content. The resulting semantic spaces demonstrate the impact patterns of the image and text parts on the creolized text understanding.

About the authors

Viktoria S. Kosenko

Russian Istitute of Theatre Arts - GITIS

Author for correspondence.
6 M. Kislovskiy per., Moscow, 125009, Russian Federation

Senior teacher of the Chair of Scenic Speech, Russian Istitute of Theatre Arts - GITIS


  1. Deyk, van T.A. 1989. Yazyk. Poznaniye. Kommunikatsiya [Language. Cognition. Communication]. Moscow: Progress. Print. (In Russ.)
  2. Golovin, S.Yu. 2007. Slovar’ psikhologa-praktika [Dictionary of Psychologist]. Minsk: Kharvest. Print. (In Russ.)
  3. Polyakov, S.D. 2011. Fenomenologiya psikhicheskikhre prezentatsiy [Phenomenology of Mental Presentations]. St. Petersburg: Piter. Print. (In Russ.)
  4. Feyyerabend, P. 2010. Proshchay, razum [Farewell to Reason]. Translated by A.L. Nikiforov. Moscow: AST; Astrel’. Print. (In Russ.)
  5. Vitgenshteyn, L.1994. Filosofskiye raboty [Philosophical Works]. Moscow: Gnozis. Print. (In Russ.)
  6. Batishchev, G. 2006. “Opredmechivaniye i raspredmechivaniye” [Objectification and Reobjectification] in Filosofskaya Entsiklopediya. Moscow: Direkt Media Pablishing. Print. (In Russ.)
  7. Isakova, N.V. “Rodovyye kharakteristiki cheloveka — klyuch k analizu sotsial’noy deyatel’nosti” [Generic Characteristics of a Person — the Key to the Analysis of Social Activity]. Web. Available: KiberLeninka: (date of access: 23.04.2019).
  8. Yung, K.G. 1929. Psikhosemanticheskiye tipy [Psychosemantic Types]. Tsyurikh: Musaget. Print. (In Russ.)
  9. Yan’shin, P.V. 2006. Psikhosemantika tsveta [Psychosemantics of Color]. St. Petersburg: Rech’, Print. (In Russ.)
  10. Osgood, Ch.E., G.Y. Suci, and Tannenbaum P.H. 1957. The Measurement of Meaning. Urbana, 520 p.



Abstract - 183

PDF (Russian) - 147




Copyright (c) 2019 Kosenko V.S.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies