Social and Political Consequences of the Pandemic for the Russian Orthodox Church

Cover Page


In the article analyzed the social and political consequences of pandemic of coronavirus for the Russian Orthodox Church in the context of the reaction of different European churches on the quarantine rules and critics towards the church inside Russia. The author used the structural-functional and institutional approaches for the evaluation of the activity of the Russian Orthodox Church, was analyzed the sources of mass-media and the public claims of the clergy. In the article was made a conclusion that Orthodox Church expressed itself during the struggle with coronavirus as national civic institute where could be represented various even polar views. Also the parish activity leads to the formation of the democratic society affiliated with the Church and the role of that phenomenon have to be explored in a future. The coronacrisis makes open the inner potential of the civic activity and different forms of the social service in Russian Church. In the same time pandemic provoked the development of the volunteer activity in the around-church environment and also in the non-church circles among the young people and the generation of 40th age where the idea of the social responsibility for themselves and people around and the significance of the civil rights was one of the popular ideas till 2019. The conditions of the self-isolation also forced the clergy to struggle for their parishioners and once again renovate the role of the church in the society and in the cyber space.

About the authors

Roman N. Lunkin

The Institute of Europe, Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
11/3, Mokhovaya St, Moscow, 125009, Russian Federation

Doctor of Sciences (Politics), Deputy Director


  1. Uzlaner D. Post-Secular Turn. How to Think about Religion in the Twenty-First Century. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Press; 2020. (In Russ.).
  2. Semenenko I.S. The Civil Solidarity and the Self-Organization against Coronavirus. Actual Commentaries. 05.05.2020. IMEMO RAN. URL: Accessed: 31.07.2020. (In Russ.).
  3. Kuznecov V.A. Far from the Freedom, close to the Justice? 10 July 2020. RSMD. URL: Accessed: 31.07.2020. (In Russ.).
  4. Lunkin R.N. The Mechanisms of the Religious Reaction on the Pandemic of the Coronavirus. Scientific and Analytical Herald of the Institute of Europe RAS. 2020; 2. DOI: 10.15211/vestnikieran22020104109 (In Russ.).
  5. Shimanskaya O.K. Social Activity of the Orthodox Church of Romania in the Context of the Struggle with the Coronavirus. Scientific and Analytical Herald of the Institute of Europe RAS. 2020. № 3. DOI: (In Russ.).
  6. Gromyko Al.A. Coronavirus as a Factor of the Global Policy. Scientific and Analytical Herald of the Institute of Europe RAS. 2020; Vol. 3: 4–13. DOI: (In Russ.).
  7. Mchedlova M.M. Religious and Confessional Identity. Identity: Person, Society, Policy. Encyclopedia. Ed. I.S. Semenenko. M.: Ves’ Mir; 2017. p. 334–338. (In Russ.).
  8. Europe between three Oceans. Monography. Ed. Al.A. Gromyko, V.P. Fedorov. M.: IE RAN: Nestor-Istoriya; 2019. p. 471–490. (In Russ.).
  9. Mitrofanova A.V. The Social Work of the Orthodox Non-government Organizations: the Trends, Goals, Typology. Humanitarian Sciences. The Herald of the Financial University. 2013; 1: 32–43. (In Russ.).
  10. Stepashina T.N., Lunkin R.N. The Russian Orthodoxy: the First Steps of the Volunteer Service. Scientific and Analytical Herald of the Institute of Europe RAS. 2018; 2: 229–237. (In Russ.).



Abstract - 441

PDF (Russian) - 176




Copyright (c) 2020 Lunkin R.N.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies