What Makes «Communication» Possible?

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

The article presents sufficient space for a thorough analysis of the conceptual issues of the Communicative Programme (the CP) developed by E. Husserl, L. Wittgenstein, K.-O. Apel, and J. Habermas who attached great importance to the fundamental role of communication in epistemological justification.
The CP analysis carried out in the article is based on a number of models worked out to provide insight into the following two arguments of the CP proponents: 1) the CP statements are justified through their universal validity; 2) There is no pure individual in the communicative society (CS). It is demonstrated that the former argument leads to a vicious circle, while the latter one - heads to overt absurdity in terms of logic.

About the authors

A N Pavlenko

Peoples' Friendship University of Russia

Email: hphilosophy@mail.ru
Кафедра онтологии и теории познанияФакультет гуманитарных и социальных наук; Российский университет дружбы народов; Peoples' Friendship University of Russia

References


Copyright (c) 2011 Pavlenko A.N.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies