SCIENCE-ART: THE UNITY OF SCIENCE AND ART

Cover Page

Abstract


The article looks into the current and near-future challenges that necessitate a different lifestyle and way of thinking. The unity of science and art (Science-Art) is viewed in the context of these challenges as a way to respond to them. The article suggests building the unity of Science-Art upon the combination of the two science principles: economy of thought and redundancy of thought, which is typical for the artistic way of thinking. The article cites S. Pereslegin’s classification of thinking patterns and main features of scientific, artistic and engineering ways of thinking. The article shows impossibility of Science-Art within scientific monolectical thinking. It demonstrates that the condition for the unity of science and art is rising to dia- and trialectic levels of thinking; and the carriers of the Science-Art unity are currently engineers.


About the authors

I N Volnov

Moscow Polytechnic University

Author for correspondence.
Email: ilja-volnov@yandex.ru
38, Bolshaya Semenovskaya str., 107023, Moscow, Russian Federation

References

  1. Kapitsa SP, Kurdyumov SP, Malinetskii GG. Sinergetika i prognozy budushchego. Moscow: Editorial URSS; 2003. (In Russ.)
  2. Panov AD. Singulyarnaya tochka istorii. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2005;(1): 122—137. (In Russ.)
  3. Kurtsveil R. Evolyutsiya razuma. Moscow: Eksmo; 2016. (In Russ.)
  4. Pereslegin SB, Pereslegina EB. «Dikie karty» budushchego. Fors-mazhor dlya chelovechestva. Moscow: Algoritm; 2015. (In Russ.)
  5. Vol'nov IN. Bol'shoi semanticheskii perekhod. Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2016;(3):368—375. (In Russ.)
  6. Nalimov VV. V poiskakh inykh smyslov. Saint Petersburg; Moscow: Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ; 2013. (In Russ.)
  7. Snou ChP. Dve kul'tury. Moscow: Progress; 1973. (In Russ.)
  8. Feinberg EL. Dve kul'tury. Intuitsiya i logika v iskusstve i nauke. Moscow: Nauka; 1992. (In Russ.)
  9. Stepin VS. Filosofiya nauki. Obshchie problemy. Moscow: Gardariki; 2006. (In Russ.)
  10. Ikona XXI veka. Kuznetsovskoe pis'mo. Avt. i sost. Kondrat'eva KL. Moscow; 2010. (In Russ.)
  11. Vol'nov IN. Kuznetsovskoe pis'mo — novatorstvo v sovremennoi ikonopisi. Observatoriya kul'tury. 2012;(5):49—55. (In Russ.)
  12. Malinetskii GG. Chtob skazku sdelat' byl'yu.. Vysokie tekhnologii — put' Rossii v budushchee. Moscow: Knizhnyi dom «LIBROKOM»; 2014. (In Russ.)
  13. Nikitin V, Pereslegin S, Paribok A. Inzhenernaya ontologiya. Inzheneriya kak stranstvie. Uchebnoe posobie. Ekaterinburg: Izdatel'skii Dom «Azhur»; 2013. (In Russ.)
  14. Al'tshuller G. Naiti ideyu: Vvedenie v TRIZ — teoriyu resheniya izobretatel'skikh zadach. Moscow: Al'pina Pablisher; 2016. (In Russ.)

Statistics

Views

Abstract - 2171

PDF (Russian) - 157

Cited-By


PlumX

Dimensions


Copyright (c) 2017 Volnov I.N.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies