ETHICAL ASECTS OF OVERCOMING CLASSICAL ARMED CONFLICTS’ CONSEQUENCES

Cover Page

Abstract


The paper carries out an ethical analysis of the political mechanisms of just restoration after war conflicts’ ending. The basis of analyses is the Just War Theory’s principles, and its result is the general parameters special, jus post bellum theory. Postwar justice hasn’t received detailed consideration from ancient and medieval philosophers, but in modern era beginning from Kant has drown many thinkers’ attention. In contemporary post war justice conception key research subject is the moral foundations of the compromise between all conflict parties in order to early violence’s cessation. However, despite growing interest in the issue, a whole range of related questions remains unresolved, e.g. who is responsible for postwar justice restoration? what kind of measures should include the process of return to the world? how to justify these actions in accordance with international law, in particular the UN Charter? Proposed in the article system of measures could be one option to these questions.


L V Yakushev

Principal contact for editorial correspondence.
etic@philos.msu.ru
Lomonosov Moscow State University GSP-1, 27-4 Lomonosovsky prospect, 119991, Moscow, Russian Federation

Якушев Леонид Викторович - магистрант второго года обучения, кафедра этики, философский факультет, Московский государственный университет имени М.В. Ломоносова

  • Koppiters B, Foushin N, Apresyan RG, editors. Nravstvennye ogranicheniya voiny: problemy i primery. Moscow: Gardariki; 2002. (In Russ).
  • Yakushev LV. Sovremennye teorii spravedlivoi voiny. Eticheskaya mysl’. 2016;16(2): 142—154. (In Russ).
  • Bordachev TV. “Novyi interventsionizm” 90-kh godov. Pro et Contra. 1998;3(4): 70—86. (In Russ).
  • Maleev YN. Kontseptual’noe obosnovanie preventivnoi gumanitarnoi interventsii. Mezhduna¬rodnoe pravo — International Law. 2009;38(2):6—20. (In Russ).
  • Orend B. Justice after War. Ethics and International Affairs. 2002;16(1):43—56.
  • Iasiello LV. Jus post bellum: The Moral Responsibilities of Victors in War. Naval War College Review. 2004;58(3):33—52.
  • Bass GJ. Jus Post Bellum. Philosophy and Public Affairs. 2004;32(4):384—412.
  • Walzer M. Just and Unjust Wars: a Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations. 4th ed. New York: Basic Books; 1977.

Views

Abstract - 53

PDF (Russian) - 19


Copyright (c) 2017 Yakushev L.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.