Lao_zi or Confucious? Hu Shih's position in the discussion about the first chinese philosopher

Cover Page

Abstract


The article is devoted to the analysis of the position of Chinese philosopher Hu Shih in the philosophical discussion in China about the historical priority of Lao-zi or Confucious. Hu Shih's argumentation of historicity of Lao-zi and of his priority is reproduced. Analyzing Hu Shih's polemics with Ling Qichao and Feng Youlan reveals the ideological background of this scientific debate.

V A Kiselev

hphilosophy@mail.ru <mailto:hphilosophy@mail.ru>
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia

Кафедра истории философииФакультет гуманитарных и социальных наук; Российский университет дружбы народов; Peoples' Friendship University of Russia

References in Roman alphabet are in a PDF file of the article

Views

Abstract - 14

PDF (Russian) - 10

Comments on this article

View all comments

Copyright (c) 2016 Philosophy