## Two Approaches to Interpretation of Hubble Diagram

**Authors:**Pavlov AE^{1}**Affiliations:**- Department of Strength of Materials and Machine Parts Russian State Agrarian University - Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy

**Issue:**Vol 25, No 4 (2017)**Pages:**390-400**Section:**Physics**URL:**http://journals.rudn.ru/miph/article/view/17433**DOI:**https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-9735-2017-25-4-390-400- Cite item

# Abstract

Supernovae of type Ia are used as standard candles in modern cosmology, they serve to testcosmological models. Interpretation of the Hubble diagram based on the standard cosmologicalmodel led cosmologists to conclusion that the Universe is ﬁlled mostly with cosmic dust andmysterious dark energy.In this paper we present exact solutions of the Friedmann equation in standard cosmologyand conformal cosmology. The theoretical curves interpolating the Hubble diagram for thelatest supernova data are expressed in an analytical form. The functions belong to the classof meromorphic Weierstrass functions. Both approaches describe the modern Hubble diagramwith the same accuracy. Physical interpretation from the standpoint of conformal cosmologyis preferable, since supernova data are described without using a Λ-term. In the standardcosmology, the Hubble diagram is described by some characteristics: a Hubble parameter (),a deceleration (), and a jerk (). As calculations show, the deceleration parameter changesits sign during the evolution of the Universe, the -parameter remains constant. In the modernera, the Universe expands with acceleration, and in the past its acceleration was negative. Thechange in the sign of acceleration, without a clear physical reason, puzzles cosmologists.It seems obvious to us that to study objects dislocated from us at distances of billions oflight years, we should not use the coordinate time customary for work in laboratories, butthe conformal time. In conformal coordinates, the behavior of photons is described as in theMinkowski space. The time intervals d and d are diﬀerent, they are related by the scale factor:d = d. The conformal luminosity distance is longer than the standard luminosity distance,which is manifested when observing distant stellar objects. As a result, the eﬀective magnitudevalue - the redshift relationship, on which the Hubble diagram is constructed, will be diﬀerent.Using the conformal Friedmann equation, we introduce the conformal parameters (), (),(). All parameters remain positive during the evolution of the Universe. The scale factorgrows with deceleration. The Universe does not experience a jerk.

# Full Text

1. Introduction A type Ia supernova occurs when a white dwarf in a double star system accumulates a mass by accretion that suﬃcient to overcome the Chandrasekhar limit. The nature of explosion of such a supernova depends on its prehistory insigniﬁcantly. Redshifts > 0.1 are large enough to ignore peculiar motions of light sources. Supernovae type Ia, suﬃciently bright stars whose absolute luminosity is known with good accuracy, they serve as standard candles for testing cosmological models. Two collaborations The Supernova Cosmology Project and High-z Supernova Search Team compared the results of observations of supernovae with theoretical predictions for luminosity distances as redshift functions. Interpretation of the Hubble diagram on the basis of a standard cosmological model with adjustable cosmological parameters led cosmologists to conclusion that the Universe is ﬁlled mainly with dust and, so-called, dark energy - a substance with an equation of state not found in Nature [1-3]. Phenomenological approach has not led to an understanding of the state of matter from which the Universe consists. Conformal cosmological model [4], based on conformal Dirac’s variables [5], allows to explain data on supernovae without Λ-term [6-9]. We show that solutions of the diﬀerential Friedmann equation belong to the class of Weierstrass meromorphic functions [10]. Therefore, it is natural to use them to compare predictions of these two approaches [11-13]. In conclusion, we show that the diﬀerence between distance modulus is interpolated by means of the Chebyshev polynomial of the fourth order with a suﬃcient degree of accuracy. 2. Friedmann equation in classical cosmology In the standard cosmological model the Friedmann equation (1) is used for ﬁtting SNe Ia data. It ties a scale of the Universe () with density of matter . Here is Newton’s constant, is a sign of curvature of a space, a dot denotes a derivative with respect to coordinate time . In generic case, the equation (1) is represented in the following form (2) where the variable is given as a ratio of a scale () to a modern one (3) is a redshift of spectral lines (observed variable), Hubble constant. In the right hand of the Friedmann equation (2) Ω are partial densities of, correspondingly, Λ-term, curvature of the space, dust-like matter, radiation, stiﬀ-state matter. For distant sources with > 1 the interpretation of the cosmological redshift as a Doppler shift is not valid [14]. An equation of continuity ˙, with an equation of state of matter which connects the density and the pressure , yields the dependence of the density on the scale factor. So, - for interstellar dust - for radiation - for contribution from Λ-term - for stiﬀ state of matter The data of modern astronomical observations are ﬁtted using cosmological parameters [2]: A solution of the Friedmann equation (2) with such parameters is presented in analytical form (4) The second derivative of the scale factor is (5) Hence, in the modern era the Universe expands with acceleration, since 2Ω Λ > Ω M ; in the past, its acceleration was negative ¨ < 0. This change of the sign of acceleration without a clear physical cause is noted by cosmologists. From the solution (4), taking into account the relation between the scale factor and the redshift (3), it follows age - redshift relationship (6) The age 0 of the modern Universe in the coordinate time can be obtained by setting in (6) Arsh (7) If we know the redshift of a certain galaxy, how do we ﬁnd the coordinate distance to it? Since for the rays of light the spacetime interval is zero we have the relation between intervals of space and time and, using the notation introduced above (8) Substituting now the Friedmann equation (2) into (9) we get an integral (10) where we denote the ratio of partial densities as 4 . The integral is calculated using the inverse Weierstrass ℘-function [12] and one obtains coordinate distance - redshift relationship (11) The resulting formula is expressed in terms of the Weierstrass ℘-function [10], satisfying the diﬀerential equation - three roots of a cubic polynomial on the right-hand side of the diﬀerential equation (12) Invariants of the Weierstrass function are the following the discriminant of a cubic polynomial is negative: In astronomy, the method of determining distances to ultra-distant objects is based on measuring their luminosity. The radiation power of an object (a star or a galaxy) is called its absolute luminosity. The ﬂux density ℓ, i.e., the radiation power per unit area, is called its visible luminosity. In Euclidean geometry they are connected by the formula (13) where is the distance from us to the radiation object. In the second century BC the Greek astronomer Hipparchus classiﬁed the stars visible to the naked eye into six classes according to their brightness. The brightest stars were assigned the ﬁrst magnitude, and barely visible - the sixth magnitude. According to Norman Pogson in 1856 it was decided that the luminosity of the objects of the ﬁrst stellar magnitude is a hundred times greater than the luminosity of the objects of the sixth stellar magnitude [14], i.e., (14) where ℓ 0 and 0 are some relevant luminosities. With the creation of photomultipliers at the beginning of the XX-th century, the factors ℓ 0 and 0 were ﬁxed. We express from (14) the apparent stellar magnitude and the absolute stellar magnitude of the object using the decimal logarithms (15) Then we express from (15) the distance modulus through the distance to the radiation object, using (13) For performing calculations, the factors ℓ 0 and 0 in (14) are chosen in such a way that the distance is measured in megaparsecs (16) where In the Friedman-Robertson-Walker cosmology, by analogy with the formula for the distance in Euclidean geometry (13), we determine a luminosity distance (17) In standard cosmology, the luminosity distance () is related to the coordinate distance (18) Here it was taken into account that the area of the sphere around the luminous object passing through the Earth increases, the frequency of photons decreases during their motion. Substituting the formula for the coordinate distance (11) into (18), we get an analytical expression for luminosity distance . Modern observational cosmology is based on the Hubble diagram. Eﬀective stellar magnitude - redshift relationship (19) is used to test cosmological theories ( in megaparsecs) [2]. Here () is the apparent magnitude, is its absolute magnitude, and is a constant. 3. Friedmann equation in conformal cosmology Interpretation of the Hubble diagram, based on a conformal cosmological model with parameters yields the same qualitative approximation as the standard cosmological model with parameters [9]. A parameter Ω rigid corresponds to a stiﬀ state of matter, when the energy density is equal to the pressure = [15, 16] that is happened under a nucleosynthesis regime in stars. We write out conformal Friedmann equation [4] with using meaningful conformal partial parameters, discarding insigniﬁcant contributions (20) The right-hand side of the equation (20) includes the densities of the state of matter () in accordance with their conformal weights; in the left, the prime denotes the derivative with respect to the conformal time. After introducing the dimensionless variable 0 , the conformal Friedmann equation (20) takes the form (21) where one root in the cubic polynomial on the right-hand side (21) is real, while the other ones are complex conjugated rigid The invariants of the cubic polynomial are as following: where is a conformal Hubble constant. The conformal Hubble parameter is related to the usual parameter as Then we introduce a new variable by the rule (22) The Weierstrass -function satisﬁes the quasi-periodicity conditions [, where and ′ are semi-periods of the function The conformal Friedmann equation (21) is integrated and we obtain the conformal age - redshift relationship in explicit form (23) The equation written out in integral form is known in cosmology as the Hubble law. An explicit formula for conformal age of the Universe 0 can be obtained by putting in (23) (24) The interval of the coordinate conformal distance is equal to the interval of the conformal time d = d, so we can represent (23) as the conformal distance - redshift relationship. In conformal coordinates, the behavior of photons is exactly the same as in the Minkowski space. The time intervals between the emission of two photons and between their absorption are the same. The time interval d = -d, used in standard cosmology, and the time interval d = -d, used in conformal cosmology, are diﬀerent. The conformal luminosity distance related to the standard luminosity distance , where () is a coordinate distance. For photons so we get an explicit dependence: luminosity distance - redshift relationship (25) The eﬀective magnitude - redshift relationship in the conformal cosmology has the form () - (26) 4. Comparative analysis According to the conformal cosmological model, the conformal quantities are physical observables. Pearson’s criterion 2 was applied in [9] for statistical ﬁtting of results on supernovae Ia [2]. The contribution from the component corresponding to the rigid state of matter rigid in the conformal model replaced the contribution from the Λ-term in the standard model. In the rigid state of matter, its energy density is equal to the pressure. As a result of the analysis, the conclusion was drawn: the best ﬁtting of the conformal model was not inferior to the best ﬁtting of the standard model [9]. The curves for the two models, according to (26) and (19), are shown in Fig. 1. Figure 1. Curves: eﬀective stellar magnitude - redshift for cosmological models considered The diﬀerence between the curves: eﬀective magnitude value - redshift - predictions of models (26) and (19), is demonstrated in Fig. 2. A slight diﬀerence between the curves, within the error of observations, is manifested in the early and late stages of the evolution of the Universe [12]. 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 z D(m-M) Figure 2. Diﬀerence between curves: eﬀective magnitude - redshift for the two models The function (27) has a complex form, but it is easy interpolated, with a suﬃcient degree of accuracy, Chebyshev polynomials of the ﬁrst kind, the least deviating from zero on the interval [-1; 1] ∆( - Here you have utilized a variable Chebyshev polynomials [17,18]: In the standard cosmology, the following characteristics are introduced to describe the Hubble diagram: Hubble parameter, a deceleration and a jerk [2] (30) As we see, the deceleration parameter (29) changes its sign during the evolution of the Universe at the inﬂection point -parameter remains constant. We deﬁne analogous parameters for the conformal cosmology (33) We calculate the conformal parameters using the conformal Friedmann equation (20). Hubble parameter deceleration parameter 0 changes from 1 to hence, the scale factor grows with deceleration; the jerk parameter 0 changes from 3 to 3Ω rigid . Dimensionless parameters () and () remain positive during the evolution. The Universe does not undergo, during its evolution, the so-called jerk - artifact of approach of the standard cosmological model. 5. Conclusions We present exact solutions of the Friedmann equation in standard cosmology and conformal cosmology. The theoretical curves interpolating the Hubble diagram for the latest supernova data are expressed in an analytical form. The functions belong to the class of meromorphic Weierstrass functions. Both approaches describe the modern Hubble diagram with the same accuracy. We introduce conformal parameters describing the Hubble diagram. All parameters remain positive during the evolution of the Universe. Acknowledgments I am grateful to Professor V. N. Pervushin for discussions on modern theoretical problems that have arisen in cosmology, and comprehensive friendly support, the Laboratory of Theoretical Physics named after N. N. Bogoliubov, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research (Dubna) for hospitality. I express my gratitude for the interest in the work to the participants of the International Winter School “Seminar on gravitation, cosmology and astrophysics” (Petrov readings), Kazan Federal University, participants of the seminar of the Department of Theoretical Physics and Mechanics of the People’s Friendship University of Russia (Moscow).

# About the authors

### A E Pavlov

Department of Strength of Materials and Machine Parts Russian State Agrarian University - Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy
**Author for correspondence.**

Email: alexpavlov60@mail.ru

49 Timiryazevskaya St., Moscow, 127550, Russian Federation

Pavlov A. E. - Candidate of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, associate professor of Department of Strength of Materials and Machine Parts of Russian State Agrarian University - Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy

# References

- A. G. Riess, et al., The Farthest Known Supernova: Support for an Accelerating Universe and a Glimpse of the Epoch of Deceleration, The Astrophysical Journal 560 (2001) 49–71.
- A. G. Riess, et al., Type Ia Supernova Discoveries at
- A. G. Riess, Nobel Lecture: My Path to the Accelerating Universe, Reviews of Modern Physics 84 (2012) 1165–1175.
- V. N. Pervushin, A. E. Pavlov, Principles of Quantum Universe, Lambert Academic Publishing, Saarbr¨ucken, 2014.
- P. A. M. Dirac, Fixation of Coordinates in the Hamiltonian Theory of Gravitation, Physical Review 114 (1959) 924–930.
- D. Behnke, et al., Description of Supernova Data in Conformal Cosmology without Cosmological Constant, Physics Letters 30 B (2002) 20–26.
- D. Behnke, Conformal cosmology approach to the problem of dark matter, Ph.D. thesis, PhD Thesis, Rostock Report MPG-VT-UR 248/04 (2004).
- A. F. Zakharov, V. N. Pervushin, V. A. Zinchuk, Tetrad Formulation and Frames of Reference in General Relativity, Physics of Particles and Nuclei 37 (2006) 104–134.
- A. F. Zakharov, V. N. Pervushin, Conformal Cosmological Model Parameters with Distant SNe Ia Data: “Gold” and “Silver”, International Journal of Modern Physics 19 D (2010) 1875–1886.
- E. T. Whittaker, G. N. Watson, A Course of Modern Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1927.
- A. E. Pavlov, Exact Solutions of Friedmann Equation for Supernovae Data (2015). URL https://arxiv.org/pdf/1511.00226.pdf
- A. E. Pavlov, Intrinsic Time in Geometrodynamics: Introduction and Application to Friedmann Cosmology (2016). URL https://arxiv.org/pdf/1606.09460
- A. E. Pavlov, Parameters of the Hubble Diagram, in: 2-nd International Winter School–Seminar on gravity, cosmology, and astrophysics. “Petrov School – 2016”, Kazan Federal University, 2016, pp. 29–30.
- S. Weinberg, Cosmology, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2008.
- Ya. B. Zel’dovich, The Equation of State at Ultrahigh Densities and its Relativistic Limitations, Soviet Physics JETP 14 (1962) 1143–1147.
- J. Narlikar, Violent Phenomena in the Universe, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1984.
- N. I. Akhiezer, Lections on Theory of Approximation, Nauka, Moscow, 1965.
- N. I. Akhiezer, Elements of Theory of Elliptic Functions, Nauka, Moscow, 1970.