Cover Page


The case of 17-year-old Afro-American Trayvon Martin shot dead in 2012 by white neighborhood watch George Zimmerman is generally reported as the first killing of what over the last few years seemed an epidemic of lethal violence committed on mostly unarmed afro-American civilians which ignited other waves of protests and rioting across the whole country. Immediately after Martin’s fatal shooting the initial absence of charges against Mr. Zimmerman’s conduct, owing to a controversial self-defense law, prompted nationwide protest and unrest. An online petition calling for a prosecution of Zimmerman garnered over two million signatures; a process against Zimmerman was then started, though in 2013 his acquittal gave birth to the international activist movement #BlackLivesMatter on social media. All these events have since then resonated in the sensationalized reports of the media which «employ textual strategies which foreground the speech act of offering values and beliefs» (Fowler 2013: 209). Within Martin & White’s Appraisal Framework (2008) qualitative samples from the US print media coverage (The New York Times and Orlando Sentinel) of Trayvon Martin’s story are investigated. More specifically, our focus is mainly on attribution and evidentiality, i.e. on the interplay of directly-quoted or indirectly-reported speech that journalistic writers use to attribute viewpoints and versions of events to a variety of external sources, especially potentially controversial meanings largely confined to material attributed to quoted sources. We aim at providing a socio-critical interpretation of how the supposedly unbiased media narratives of ethnic affairs contributed to inflame racial passions, and, by funneling audience attention toward certain topics, influenced public perceptions of important issues.

1. Introduction Key people and facts The case of 17-year-old unarmed Afro-American Trayvon Martin, shot dead in February 2012 by white neighbourhood watch George Zimmerman, stands as the first mediatic symbol of the many racially-profiled confrontations the US has been coping with ever since. Amidst the growing media frenzy and active participation of the public, a whirlwind of controversy and political debate surrounded the reports of this murder. The shooting, initially covered by the Florida media alone, was soon seized on by the national media, and race was reported as central to the tragedy since Zimmerman, a white male of Latino heritage born from a Peruvian mother, was accused of racially profiling the Afro-American teen Martin. The Zimmerman affair highlighted in fact race relations in the United States, prompting nationwide protest and unrest, and his trial became one of the most racially-charged, and apparently most politically motivated prosecutions in recent U.S. history (Adjei, Gill 2013, Bhandaru 2013). On a rainy night on Feb. 26th, 2012, the 17-year-old Trayvon Martin, was heading back to the house of his father’s fiancée at the Retreat at Twin Lakes, a gated community in Sanford in central Florida[12]. Martin had gone to a 7-Eleven store, a convenience store, to buy candies and iced-tea for his step-brother, and was wearing a hooded sweat shirt - something his parents and their supporters maintain led Zimmerman to racially profile the unarmed teenager, and which, for this reason, would become a symbol[13]. While walking through the complex, Trayvon was spotted by George Zimmerman, a self-appointed neighbourhood watch volunteer, who was patrolling the area in his vehicle. Zimmerman called authorities to report someone suspicious, since, in his recorded words, “he seems like up to no good, on drugs or something [...] and black”[14]. The dispatcher advised him to let the police handle it, but Zimmerman ignored that and proceeded to follow Martin. A confrontation ensued and Martin was shot in the chest. Zimmerman admitted from the beginning that he had fired a single shot from his handgun, killing Martin. Nevertheless, five hours after Trayvon’s murder, Zimmerman was released on his claim of having acted in self-defense, and his right to defend himself even with lethal force, under Florida’s controversial ‘Stand Your Ground’ statute. However, a petition on Change.org, created by Trayvon Martin’s parents, calling for a full investigation and prosecution of Zimmerman, surpassed two million signatures, while, as a sign of solidarity, hundreds of Trayvon’s supporters organized nationwide rallies and marches wearing hoodies, same as the one Trayvon was wearing the night he was murdered and then walked in the so-called ‘Million Hoodie March’ in New York, a march which launched the ‘Million Hoodies Movement[15]. After weeks of protests and demonstrations across the nation, the furor reached all the way to the White House. On March 23rd, 2012 President Barack Obama himself spoke out publicly for the first time on the ever-growing controversy over the shooting of Trayvon Martin, saying that the incident called for national “soul-searching”, and he also added Martin’s parents are right to expect that all of us as Americans are going to take this with the seriousness it deserves, and we are going to get to the bottom of exactly what happened. If I had a son he would look like Trayvon[16]. As the controversy roared, a special state prosecutor was finally appointed to review the case. Zimmerman was eventually arrested and charged with second-degree murder and manslaughter, though on July 13, 2013 he was acquitted by a Florida jury. This outcome was frequently reported as representative of the general state of race relations in the U.S. The ensuing national debate led to a confrontation that touched off issues of race and guns, bringing to the fore a multifaceted and contested vision of the facts. The role and impact of multi-media and cross-media communication in the shaping of the events cannot be overestimated, as voiced by many journalistic authors, for example: When the criminal justice system appears to fall short, the court of public opinion takes over and suddenly both victim and ostensible perpetrator go on trial. But what is also being adjudicated is our ability to debate highly charged issues in a very divided media landscape. Let’s be careful out there (Carr 2012)[17]. His acquittal gave birth to the international activist movement ‘Black Lives Matter’ (BLM) with the hashtag #BlackLivesMatter on social media. This movement, which would change the country is considered Trayvon Martin’s legacy. But how did «one black child’s death on a dark, rainy street in a small Florida town become the match that lit a civil rights crusade?»[18]. Since Trayvon was murdered, his mother Sybrina Fulton has been on the national stage, and has devoted her life to travelling around the country to speak about racial violence on behalf of the ‘Trayvon Martin Foundation’ established in March 2012 as a social justice not-for-profit organization committed to ending senseless gun violence[19]. Trayvon Martin’s death is generally reported as the first killing of what, over the last few years, has seemed an epidemic of lethal violence committed on mostly unarmed afro-American civilians at the hands of police, as well as several deaths while in police custody (Michael Brown in Ferguson, Eric Garner in Staten Island, Laquan McDonald in Chicago, Tamir Rice in Cleveland, Walter Scott in North Carolina, Freddie Gray in Baltimore, Alfred Okwera Olango in suburban San Diego, to name but a few), which ignited other waves of protests and rioting across the whole country. The echo of Trayvon Martin’s shooting still resonates, five years after his death as a symbol of social justice activism. On February 26th 2017, on Oscar night, for instance, some Hollywood celebrities and public figures shared on their social media photos of themselves while wearing hoodies, or a sweatshirt emblazoned with Trayvon’ name, sending worldwide the message “Our hoodies are still up and the movement is still strong”[20]. In May 2017, Florida Memorial University announced Trayvon Martin as Recipient of a Posthumous Bachelor of Science Degree in Aviation, as an iconic figure of the fight for equal justice for all[21]. Trayvon Martin’s case has clearly had an unsettling impact on US societal values and belief systems, increased distrust between the police and black community and prompted an inflamed national discussion about race and self-defense which, as said above, resonated in the sensationalized reports of the media. It is well-known that “the media convey public knowledge, as well as expressed or implicit opinions, about social groups and events and [...] provide an ideological framework for the interpretation of ethnic events. This framework may also act as a legitimation for prejudices and discrimination” (van Dijk 2015:209). News media, in particular, can easily favour particular value positions (affectual and judgmental), while employing a relatively impersonal style in which evaluations and other potentially contentious meanings are largely confined to material attributed to quoted sources (White 2005, 2012). Accordingly, by exploring the (print) media coverage of this story, where legal and sociological debates are involved (Babacan et al. 2009), the present study - within a broad critical discourse analytical perspective - aims at providing a socio-critical interpretation of how the media discourse/s contributed to ignite racial passions, and to generate new and potentially disruptive social dynamics. At the same time, this study attempts to highlight how the escalation of racially-profiled violence, and other outrages which have taken place in US society since Trayvon’s shooting, suggest that its legislation is possibly no longer able to cope with a nation where, by 2020, the word ‘minorities’ will lose its present significance. In this scenario, qualitative samples from the US press media (The New York Times and Orlando Sentinel) are analyzed, and the legal and socio-cultural implications discussed. 2. Background: ideologies and laws Florida’s controversial ‘Stand Your Ground’ Statute Grounded in the USA Gun Culture/s - a culture of no immediate understanding for Europe - the 776.013 Statute on “Home protection; use or threatened use of deadly force; presumption of fear of death or great bodily harm”[22] was first adopted in Florida in 2005 and then enacted in some form in more than 20 states. Commonly known as the ‘Stand Your Ground’ law (or ‘shoot first law’, as its critics say), the 776.013 Statute was drafted and promoted by the National Rifle Association, and explicitly allows the use of deadly force, and it never requires that one withdraw or retreat before using deadly force, and the requirements of reasonableness are attenuated or essentially removed because the other witness is dead, and the defender may shade the truth, [and so determine in point of fact a prosecutorial immunity]. Thus, Stand Your Ground laws may provide a rock-solid defense to paranoid or dangerously aggressive people who are armed with deadly force. (O’ Meara 2012)[23]. Apparently, the Trayvon Martin shooting suggests that lawmakers and gun advocates have gone too far in authorizing the use of deadly force; Zimmerman’s acquittal was due to the 776.013 and 776.032 Statutes[24]. From the contentious debate on such no duty to retreat laws and related events a basic question arises for the (thoughtful) United States citizens: what does a doctrine that relieves U.S. citizens, in their homes, of the duty to try to flee an intruder’s attack before resorting to force in self defense, have to do with shoot-outs in public streets? Attorney-General Eric Holder’s emphasized how the “stand-your-ground’ laws senselessly expand the concept of self-defence and sow dangerous conflict in our neighbourhoods”, thus denouncing the masked dangers in its formulation. 3. Methodology and aims Within a broadly conceived discourse analysis approach, our investigation of qualitative samples from the US print media coverage (The New York Times and Orlando Sentinel) of Trayvon Martin’s story is an application of the Appraisal Framework (Martin & White 2005; White 2012 a, b). The Appraisal Framework (AF) appears particularly useful for our analysis, since it mainly deals with Media Commentary and Journalistic voice[25], and is suitable «to explore ‘objectivity’ and ‘subjectivity’ in journalistic discourse and to explore how the different ‘voices’ or sub-registers of journalistic discourse can be seen to vary according to their different use of Appraisal values»[26]. More specifically, a major focus is on attribution and evidentiality, i.e. on the interplay of directly-quoted or indirectly-reported speech that journalistic writers use to attribute viewpoints and versions of events to a variety of external sources, especially potentially controversial meanings are largely confined to material attributed to quoted sources. Viewed from the Appraisal Framework perspective, attribution and so-called ‘evidentiality’ are concerned with the linguistic resources by which speakers/writers include, and adopt a stance towards what they represent as the words, observations, beliefs and viewpoints of other speakers/writers. This is an area which has been widely covered in the literature under such headings as [...] “direct and indirect speech”, “intertextuality” and, following Bakhtin, “heteroglossia”. At its most basic level, this attribution or intertextual positioning is brought into play when a writer/speaker chooses to quote or reference the words or thoughts of another. Furthermore, integrative resources for our analysis were found in Martin and White’s The Language of Evaluation: appraisal in English[27], where the resources of appraisal are related to the categories of ‘news’, ‘analysis’ and ‘comment/opinion’. Accordingly, three media roles are identified, in line with the evaluative choices entailed in the roles of reporter, correspondent and commentator, as follows: Figure 1. (Martin and White 2005: 173) Of relevance for our analysis is that the commentator voice has “no co-textual constraints on judgement” with “free occurrence of unmediated social sanction and social esteem” (Martin and White 2005: 173). Indeed, in the excerpts under investigation, among the less autonomous reporters’ voices, the commentators’ voices are more noticeable and authoritative. 4. Attribution Our analysis also drew on P.R. White’s more recent investigations in the axiological/value positions of ‘reporter’s voice’ in news stories through attribution and attitudinal positioning (2012b)[28]. Attribution within Appraisal Framework (AF) theory, is defined as a mechanism whereby the journalistic author, through directly-quoted or indirectly-reported speech, presents the viewpoints and versions of event on offer in an article as derived from some external source (White 2012: 57). In White’s account[29] AF developed as researchers felt the need to define more precisely the attitudinal values by which texts apply social norms to evaluate human behaviour. Appraisal is now an umbrella term to cover all evaluative uses of language, whose two core concerns are: how speakers/writers adopt and indicate positive or negative attitudes and how they negotiate these attitudinal and other types of positioning with actual or potential dialogic partners[30]. The AF thus explores the way language is used to evaluate and/or to adopt stances, to construe textual personas. AF investigates how affective involvement can be conveyed through a set of indicators including exclamation, repetition, intensification and attitudinal lexis, and so on. This could clarify certain patterns by which so-called ‘objective’ texts within the media favour certain values of attitude while excluding others[31]. AF consequently deals with Media Commentary and Journalistic voice[32], where it appears particularly useful «to explore ‘objectivity’ and ‘subjectivity’ in journalistic discourse and to explore how the different ‘voices’ or sub-registers of journalistic discourse can be seen to vary according to their different use of Appraisal values»[33]. The system of Appraisal comprises three large interactive subsystems Attitude Gradation Engagement Attitude Attitude concerns the speakers’ positive/ negative assessment of people, places, things, state of affairs and their associate emotional/affectual responses. Attitude can be conveyed in various ways, it may be expressed not by single words (though individual words can be attitudinal) but by phrases and sentences, and, above all, by the interaction of diverse elements of statements which transmit the writers’ propositions and viewpoints, and, therefore, need to be analysed as a whole. Attitudinal Positioning may concern positive and negative evaluations involving I. Affect II. Judgement III. Appreciation Martin and White have schematized these three subcategories as in Table 1: Table 1 Clause frames for distinguishing types of Attitude System Clause frame Example Affect person feels affect about something it makes person feel affect that [proposition] I feel happy (about that/that they’ve come). It makes me feel happy that they’ve come Judgement it was Judgement for/of person to do that (for person) to do that was Judgement It was silly of/for them to do For them) to do that was silly. Appreciation Person considers something appreciation Person sees something as appreciation I consider it beautiful. They see it as beautiful Source: J.R. Martin, P.R.R. White, The Language of Evaluation: The Appraisal Framework, London &New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2005, pp. 58-9. Affect is thus concerned with emotional reactions and disposition; Judgement refers to meanings which serve to evaluate human behaviour positively and negatively by reference to a set of institutionalized norms. Judgement can be either explicit or implicit and is divided into two broad categories, Social Esteem and Social Sanction, as shown in Table 2. It is vital, additionally, to distinguish between what can be termed ‘inscribed’ (or explicit) Judgement and ‘tokens’ of Judgement (or implicit Judgement). Inscribed evaluation is explicitly expressed by means of lexical items overtly carrying the Judgement value, thus, skilfully, corruptly, lazily etc. However, Judgement values can be also triggered by ‘tokens’ of Judgement, in authors’ terms. These tokens, may imply Judgement values by apparently neutral, ideational meanings which nevertheless depending upon the reader’s social/cultural/ideological reader position, are meant to evoke Judgemental responses. Appreciation relates to positive and negative assessments of material objects (artefacts, work of art, texts, processes, and so on). In some cases, the choice of particular words or phrases overtly states the writer’s stance but, generally, the situation is far more complex thus requiring more careful scrutiny. Depending on its more or less immediate ‘readability’, attitude can be implicitly conveyed, rather than explicitly indicated: Attitude may be either Explicit or Implicit. Explicit attitude is expressed by overt evaluative/attitudinal words, phrases or sentences, that is to say utterances which straightforwardly communicate a positive or negative sense. As for implicit attitude, on the contrary, it is not easy to locate instances of evaluative/attitudinal expressions. Under implicit Attitude, authors include instances of evaluative/attitudinal expressions, which are not easy to locate: the reader’s particular sets of beliefs and expectations will lead him to interpret and consider the writing as un/true, un/acceptable, un/attractive. Table 2 The full system of Judgement Social Esteem positive [admire] negative [criticise] Normality (custom) ‘is the person’s behaviour unusual, special, customary?’ standard, everyday, average...; lucky, charmed...; fashionable, avant garde... eccentric, odd, maverick...; unlucky, unfortunate...; dated, unfashionable... Capacity ‘is the person competent, capable?’ skilled, clever, insightful...; athletic, strong, powerful...; sane, together... stupid, slow, simple-minded...; clumsy, weak, uncoordinated...; insane, neurotic... tenacity (resolve) ‘is the person dependable, well disposed?’ plucky, brave, heroic...; reliable, dependable...; indefatigable, resolute, persevering cowardly, rash, despondent...; unreliable, undependable...; distracted, lazy, unfocussed... Social Sanction positive [praise] negative [condemn] Veracity (truth) ‘is the person honest?’ honest, truthful, credible...; authentic, genuine...; frank, direct...; deceitful, dishonest...; bogus, fake...; deceptive, obfuscatory... propriety (ethics) ‘is the person ethical, beyond reproach?’ good, moral, virtuous...; law abiding, fair, just...; caring, sensitive, considerate... bad, immoral, lascivious...; corrupt, unjust, unfair...; cruel, mean, brutal, oppressive... Source: P.R.R, White, An introductory tour through appraisal theory. Judgement evaluating human behaviour. http://grammatics. com/appraisal/AppraisalOutline/UnFramed/AppraisalOutline.htm#P186_38019, (21 December 2011). More details can be obtained on the appraisal website www.grammatics.com/appraisal in the “Introductory Course in Appraisal Analysis”. In ‘quality’ or ‘broadsheet’ news media, articles may also be read as ‘detached’, ‘impartial’, while at the same time they may advance a particular (axiological) value position. A kind of strategic impersonalisation is mainly achieved by employing a relatively impersonal style, through which attitudinal evaluations and other potentially contentious meanings are largely confined to materials attributed to quoted sources (White 2012: 57, passim). In particular, reporting verbs and adjuncts can have the double function of indicating the ‘stance’ both of the (primary) authorial voice vis-à-vis the attributed material, and of the (secondary) quoted source’s voice towards such material. Key notions concerning the workings of attribution in the news are: attribution and so-called ‘evidentiality’, (grounded in Bakhtinian notions of dialogism), leading to strategic impersonalisation; ‘invoked’ attitude which is further divided into: implicit or ‘Provoked’ Attitude - PrvA (e.g. ‘He only visits his extremely frail mother once a year’), and ‘Evoked’ Attitude - EvkA (e.g. ‘Mr Bush was elected president with 500,000 fewer votes than his opponent’); the semantics of reporting (ad)verbs (e.g. say-s/said, tell-s/told, claim-s/ed, reportedly...) and evidentials (it seems/ed, appears/ed, apparently....); As regards the primary authorial (reporter’s) voice, White’s frame (2012: 64) outlines different levels as follows: Figure 2. Dialogistic association (White 2012: 64) Figure 3. Dialogistic options for the primary voice (White 2012: 65) In order to visually represent how the secondary (source’s) voice is ‘embedded’ in the report by the primary voice (i.e. the journalistic voice reporting what the informant/ source voice said about the events), we outlined the following pattern: The (primary) authorial voice vis-à-vis the (secondary) quoted source voice towards attributed materials Figure 4. Visualising the 'Chinese boxes' relationship between authorial voice and quoted source voice towards attribuited materials 5. Racism in discourse-analytical terms Relevantly, in terms of discourse analysis, in our journalistic texts, racial issues are always reported but never (explicitly) supported/endorsed. Nowadays, in official USA communication, an overtly racist attitude would immediately be censured. Nonetheless, racism-tainted ideologies and stereotyped structures are still detectable in some everyday (discursive) practices, mainly in the form of implicitly expressed stereotypes, e.g. “He is Jewish, but he’s very nice” (Quasthoff 1978, 1989). In discourse-analytical terms, one of the most valuable contributions of van Dijk’s (1984, 1997) model to the investigation of racist discourse is the heuristic assistance it provides in linking the generation of prejudice to larger discursive units than the sentence. According to van Dijk et al (1997), in social memory the collectively shared beliefs of a society are stored and organized as attitudes, and as such are fitted into group schemata that provide the cognitive basis of our information processing about members of outgroups[34]. Furthermore, from different visual perspectives, other and even contrasting scenarios can easily be shaped in such and similar cases - even more so in the contemporary web-wired, multimedia, g/local arena, which allows events and related information to resonate in real time beyond socio-geographic constraints. One relevant example is the letter of Trayvon Martin’s mother to the Brown family: “If They Refuse to Hear Us, We Will Make Them Feel Us” (Time Magazine, 18 August 2014), which immediately created a virtually visible, empathic bond between the two events. To this end «newspapers employ textual strategies which foreground the speech act of offering values and beliefs» (Fowler 2013:209) and can favour particular value position, while employing a (seemingly) relatively impersonal style in which evaluations and other potentially contentious meanings are largely confined to material attributed to quoted sources (White 2005, 2012a,b). From this analytical perspective, our investigation aimed at providing a socio-critical interpretation of how the supposedly unbiased media narratives of ethnic affairs contributed to inflame racial passions, and, by funnelling audience attention toward certain topics and/or by influencing public perceptions of important issues, highlight new social dynamics. 6. CORPUS The present work investigated a selection of print media reports on the killing of Trayvon and related events, in order to highlight how crucial the management of different perspectives can be to effective journalistic communication. Including and attributing a proposition implies that the writer finds it relevant to the ongoing communicative event. Besides, “By referencing the words of another, the writer, at the very least, indicates that these words are in some way relevant to his/her current communicative purposes. Thus the most basic intertextual evaluation is one of implied relevance” (White 2015). According to relevance criteria[35], we extrapolated excerpts from the two sub-corpora (The New York Times; Orlando Sentinel) under examination and investigated the linguistic choices made by these two newspapers. From the killing of Trayvon Martin (26 February 2012) to the acquittal of George Zimmerman (13 July, 2013), thousands of articles have been published in the USA print media. For our investigation, we selected 20 articles from The New York Times (NYT) and 20 from Orlando Sentinel (OS), according to relevance criteria, i.e., more specifically, the recognizable presence of a reported source. The total running words are 25.884 for NYT and 21711 for OS. The New York Times was chosen because it is the largest daily local metropolitan newspaper in the United States and the third in national circulation (after USA Today and The Wall Street Journal) and is regarded as an authoritative national newspaper of public record. In order to compare print media communication at the national and local level, Orlando Sentinel was chosen, as it is the primary newspaper of Orlando (Fla), and of the Central Florida region. It has historically tilted conservative; it has only endorsed a Democrat for president three times since 1964 (Lyndon Johnson in 1964, John Kerry in 2004 and Barack Obama in 2008). 7. AF framing of the data Attribution framing of the data The different modes of Attribution highlighted in the Tables below are presented as follows: Legend ♦ primary voice - pv (i.e., the reporter’s voice): e.g. “Mr. Obama saidpv” ♦ secondary voice - sv (i.e., the source’s voice): e.g. “All of us have to do some soul searching to figure out how does something like this happen. sv” ♦ attributed materials - AM ♦ neutrally acknowledging -aknw: e.g. “she said aknw in an interview” ♦ distancing - DST: “He cautionedDST that” ♦ endorsing - ENDS: e.g. prove, demonstrate ♦ ‘evoked’ attitude - EkdA: e.g. “unarmed black high school studentEkdA” ♦ ‘provoked’ attitude - PkdA: e.g. “who had been carrying only an iced tea and a bag of Skittles. PkdA”) ♦ reporting (ad)verbs in italics: e.g. reported/ly) ♦ evidentials in bold: e.g. seems/ed, appears/ed... apparently) However, since it could be confusing to highlight all (embedded) modes in the same Tables, only the salient characteristics of each excerpt will be pointed out, though with some predictable overlapping. The Tables below therefore clearly illustrate how this dialogistic interplay is deployed in print media texts. 8. Excerpts from the New York Times Table 3 “Shooting Focuses Attention on a Program That Seeks to Avoid Guns” NYT Excerpt March 22, 2012 “In every presentation, I go through what the rules and responsibilities are,sv” she [Wendy Dorival, volunteer watch coordinator] said pv-aknw Thursday. The volunteers’ role, she said, pv-aknw is “being the eyes and ears sv” for the police, “not the vigilante. sv-EkdA” Members of a neighborhood watch “are not supposed to confront anyone,sv” she said.pv-aknw Using a gun in the neighborhood watch role would be out of the question, EkdA she said pv-aknw in an interview. Mr. Zimmerman was there, she recalled pv-aknw and the local group appointed him their coordinator.AM [SHIFT OF VOICE - only pv] But on Feb. 26, Mr. Zimmerman, 28, pursued, confronted and fatally shot, Trayvon Martin, 17, an unarmed black high school student EkdA who had been carrying only PkdA an iced tea and a bag of Skittles. short comment - The reporter’s voice (primary voice) is first ‘neutrally’ acknowledging the source’s secondary voice (Wendy Dorival’s); then the pv empathic attitude comes to the fore. Table 4 “Obama Speaks Out on Trayvon Martin Killing” NYT Excerpt - March 23, 2012 The president often appearspv perturbed when he is asked off-topic questions at ceremonial events, but on Friday, he seemedpv eager to address the case, which has quickly developed into a cause célèbre around the country. He cautionedsv-DST that his comments would be limited because the Justice Department was investigating. But he talked at lengthpv-aknw about his personal feelings about the case. “I think every parent in America should be able to understand why it is absolutely imperative that we investigate every aspect of this,sv-PkdA” Mr. Obama said.pv-aknw “All of us have to do some soul searching to figure out how does something like this happen. sv-PkdA” short comment - The (reporter’s) primary voice’s general attitude is endorsing; the secondary voice’s belongs to a ‘specified’ source (i.e., a named individual, Mr. Obama[36]) and displays patent ‘affectual’ tones. Table 5 “Race, Tragedy and Outrage Collide After a Shot in Florida” NYT Excerpt 01 Apr.2012 Still, Mr. Zimmerman seemed to have pv a protective streak - a sense of right and wrong - that others admired.pv-aknw For example, Stephanie, a neighbor of the elder Zimmermans and a family friend, recalledsv how George Zimmerman struck up a friendshipEkdA with one of her sons, Douglas, who is autistic, swimming with him, taking him for car rides and letting him play with Mr. Zimmerman’s dog, Princess. “He just felt comfortable with George”, she said. pv-aknw “For Dougie, everything was ‘George, George, George.’ EkdA ” short comment - The (reporter’s) acknowledging primary voice is mainly endorsing towards the specified source - Stephanie’s sv. Table 6 “A Shooting, and Instant Polarization” NYT April 1, 2012 130 That the public is rendering its verdict immediately and firmly may be routine, but choosing sides takes on a deeper, more dangerous meaning when race is at the heart of the story.EkdA Race as an explosive issue is nothing new, but it’s been staggering to see it simmer and boil over in our hyper-divided media environment where nonstop coverage on the Web and cable television creates a rush to judgment every day.PkdA Partisan politics and far-flung conflicts fit nicely into that world PkdA - who’s ahead, who’s behind, should we stay or go? - but racial conflict? Not so much.EkdA But if we have learned anything in the last few years, it is that traditional media are now only in charge of part of the story. There is a paucity of facts and an excess of processing power because everyone with a keyboard is theoretically a creator and distributor of content.DST Most of those efforts begin from behind a firmly established battle line, then row backward to find the facts that they need. Was that a dark spot on the back of George Zimmerman’s head in the grainy police video, or evidence of a beat-down? We retweet and “like” what we agree with and dismiss the rest. DST What is also being adjudicated is our ability to debate highly charged issues in a very divided media landscape. Let’s be careful out there. PkdA short comment - The primary voice comments the limitations of the new non-professional media which monologically dismiss the complexity of events and flatten out the polyphony of voices. 9. Excerpts from Orlando Sentinel Table 7 “We are gathered here today to demand justice in teen’s fatal shooting” O.S. Excerpt - March 14, 2012 What occurred here is tragic and horrific,PkdA" saidpv-aknw Davis, 64. “Every American citizen should be outraged. PkdA” Davis, like many others, thinks Trayvon was confronted - and ultimately shot to death - because he was black.PkdA AM [SHIFT OF VOICE] The shooter, George Zimmerman, claimedpv-DST he acted in self-defense, [SHIFT OF VOICE] and has not been arrested or charged. [SHIFT OF VOICE] Sanford police say they don't have enough evidence to make an arrest pv-aknw AM short comment - Here the (reporter’s) primary voice displays different attitudes to different secondary voices mainly to the effect of dis-endorsing Zimmerman. Table 8 “Should ‘stand your ground’ change?” O.S. Excerpt - February 25, 2013 Zimmerman took a leadership role in organizing his community's Neighborhood Watch, amid a string of burglaries,PkdA some reportedly perpetrated by black teens. PkdA He often reported people he found suspicious to police. The last was Trayvon. Is Zimmerman racist? Reports released so far from an FBI civil rights investigation have turned up little to say he is.EkdA AM However, a former coworker accused Zimmerman of racial insults, AM and a relative, who also sayssv Zimmerman molested her when they were both children, toldsv investigators Zimmerman and his kin don't like black people.AM short comment - The (reporter’s) primary voice neutrally refers contrasting opinions. However, the pv’s non-committal attitude towards other allegations against Zimmerman ends up by subtly endorsing him. Table 9 “Tensions still simmer in Trayvon Martin shooting case” O.S. Excerpt - March 17, 2012 A series of 911 calls from the last moments of Trayvon's lifePkdA were supposed to shed light on why police have not arrested the shooter,PkdA crime-watch volunteer George Zimmerman. Instead, they have fueled even more ragePkdA - not just in Central Florida, but across the country. Trayvon's family and supporters vow they won’t give up until Zimmerman is charged with the 17-year-old’s slaying late last month.AM ENDS At the heart of this maelstrom - in which the thorny issues of race and justice have surfaced as themesPkdA - is a boy who dreamed of becoming a pilot and liked to work with his hands. PkdA short comment - The (reporter’s) primary voice empathically refers the event strongly endorsing the Martin family and their supporters’ involvement and stance, also by setting the untimely death of Trayvon against the background of his expectations for the future. Table 10 “Police: Zimmerman says Trayvon decked him with one blow then began hammering his head” March 26, 2012| [PV] With a single punch, Trayvon Martin decked the Neighborhood Watch volunteer who eventually shot and killed the unarmed 17-year-old, then Trayvon climbed on top of George Zimmerman and slammed his head into the sidewalk, leaving him bloody and battered, law-enforcement authorities told the Orlando Sentinel.AM That is the account Zimmerman gave police, and much of it has been corroborated by witnesses, AM authorities say.aknw There have been no reports that a witness saw the initial punch Zimmerman told police about. DST Zimmerman has not spoken publicly about what happened Feb. 26. But that night, and in later meetings, he described and re-enacted for police what he says took place. DST [...] [SV] Civil-rights leaders and more than a million other people have demanded Zimmerman's arrest, calling Trayvon a victim of racial profiling and suggesting Zimmerman is a vigilante. Trayvon was an unarmed black teenager who had committed no crime, EkdA they say,sv who was gunned down while walking back from a 7-Eleven store with nothing more sinister than a package of Skittles and can of Arizona iced tea. PkdA short comment - In the first excerpt from this article, the reporter’s voice (pv) refers Zimmermann’s version in an apparently neutral mode, though a distancing attitude towards the attributed materials is discernable. In the second, the source’s secondary voice (i.e., civil-rights leaders, etc.) emerges in the lexical choices conveying strongly empathic attitudes. Table 11 “Facts vs. Rumours” O.S. Excerpt - 2 April 2012 Trayvon took his last breath in a bed of damp grass just feet from the safety of a relative's home a few minutes before the NBA All-Star Game was set to tip off in Orlando.PkdA short comment - Again, the (reporter’s) primary voice empathically refers the event by dramatically depicting the circumstances. 10. Discussion Overall, we can say that the dynamics of strategic impersonalization are more subtly operated in The New York Times, though both newspapers (The New York Times and Orlando Sentinel) - as professional print media - skilfully avoided taking an explicit position or displaying emotional attitudes on burning issues, mainly by attributing opinions and attitudes to quoted sources. The entailed issues concern the readers’ fruition/ position and inferences. To what extent do print media readers typically read news texts as ‘factual’ and ‘neutral’, so that their value positions are naturalised/accepted tout court? Referring to the relevance criterion of inference (Sperber and Wilson 1986, 1995, 1997), we can assume that the inferential comprehension of the journalistic authors’ stances relies on the deductive processing of the information, which is “spontaneous, automatic, and unconscious, and it gives rise to certain contextual effects in the cognitive environment of the audience” (Jaworski and Coupland 2006: 15). Simply put, the readership should be able, predictably, to infer the journalistic authors’ value positions and stances. However, as our analysis highlighted, the communicative arrangements by which the journalistic authors dialogistically engage with the diversity of voices and viewpoints can be sophisticated, and the primary and secondary voices’ interplay in the print news-reporting texts in conveying underlying axiological/attitudinal orientations can become complex. Hence, it can be difficult for readers to be aware of the underlying axiological interests at stake and to unveil such impersonalisation strategies. To gauge and measure the extent of the print media readers’ awareness could be an interesting topic for further investigation in the domain of cognitive research. 11. Concluding remarks Clashing sociocultural scenarios turned the killing of Trayvon and its aftermath into an impressive media battle by fuelling a national confrontation about the thorny issues of race, profiling, self-defense laws and gun control and their interplay. In this arena we investigated examples of print media (meta-)discourse/s, aiming to highlight the multi-layered interplay of primary and secondary professional journalistic voices, following the dynamics of strategic impersonalization. Indeed, nowadays, professional journalistic writers are only partially in charge of news and opinions communication, and concerns are voiced on how and to what extent “the excess of processing power allows everyone with a keyboard [...to become] theoretically a creator and distributor of content. [...] We retweet and “like” what we agree with and dismiss the rest” (Carr 2012)[37], regardless of considerations of reliability and quality of the news. We are increasingly experiencing how the social media (FB, Twitter etc), fora, blogs and platforms for change (the most famous one being “Change.org”) enable individuals and groups to mobilize support by forming posses, and win change both at local and at global level. Only thanks to the media attention and coverage - i.e. to the court of public opinion - could the case be presented to a court of law, where Zimmerman was charged with second degree murder (though later acquitted). As the Martins’ lawyer, Benjamin Crump, said, “Thank God for the media, because I’m not sure we ever would have gotten the truth out” (Boedeker and Comas 2012)[38]. The lawyers for the Martin family became frequent TV guests on morning programs, cable news and local newscasts. Martin/Zimmerman case shows how contemporary interactive news culture can re-shape and even reverse the course of events: without such a volume of media attention, the State of Florida vs Zimmermann trial would never have taken place.


University of Naples Federico II

Email: fcavalie@unina.it
1 Via Porta di Massa, Naples, 80133, Italy Aggregate Professor of English Language and Translation at the Department of Human Studies of the University of Naples Federico II. Research interests: Translation Studies, Аudio-Visual Translation, Cross-cultural Communication, Language and Media, Multilingualism, Critical Linguistics and (multimodal) Discourse Analysis, Appraisal Theory, English for Special (Academic) Purposes and the translation of scientific texts

  • Abbamonte, L. (2012). Integrated Methodology for Emotion Talk in Socio-legal Exchanges. Politeness, Accommodation and Appraisal Insights. Napoli: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane.
  • Adjei, P. B., & Gill, J. K. (2013). What has Barack Obama’s election victory got to do with race? A closer look at post-racial rhetoric and its implication for antiracism education. Race Ethnicity and Education, 16(1), 134-153.
  • Babacan, H., Gopalkrishnan, N., & Babacan, A. (2009). Situating racism. The local, national and the global. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.
  • Bhandaru, D. (2013). Is White Normativity Racist? Michel Foucault and Post-Civil Rights Racism. Polity, 45(2), 223-244.
  • Bhatia, V., Candlin, C., Engberg, J. (2008). Legal Discourse across Cultures and Systems. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
  • Burns, A. R., Matarazzo O, Abbamonte L. (2014). Corpus Linguistics and the Appraisal Framework for Retrieving Emotion and Stance - The Case of Samsung’s and Apple’s Facebook Pages. In Bassis S., Esposito A., Morabito F. C. (eds) Recent Advances of Neural Networks Models and Applications. vol. 26, pp. 283-294, Springer, ISBN: 978-3-319-04128-5, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-04129-2.
  • Cavaliere, F. (2012). The Shaping of the News. How Information can be moulded by the Press. Roma: Edizioni Nuova Cultura.
  • Clore, G. L., & Huntsinger, J. R. (2007). How emotions inform judgment and regulate thought. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 393-399.
  • Clore, G.L. & Schnall, S. (2008). Affective Coherence: Affect as Embodied Evidence in Attitude, Advertising, and Art. In G. R. Semin, E. Smith (eds) Embodied Grounding: Social, Cognitive, Affective, and Neuroscientific Approaches, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 211-236.
  • Colombo, M. (2004). Theoretical Perspectives in Media-Communication Research: From Linear to Discursive Models. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, [S.l.], 5 (2), May.
  • Dolan, R. J. (2000). Emotion, cognition, and behavior. SCIENCE 298 (5596) 1191-1194.
  • Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional Vision. American Anthropologist. 96 (3): 606-633.
  • Higgins, E. T., & Bargh, J. A. (1987). Social cognition and social perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 369-425.
  • Humphreys, M. & Garry, J. (2000). Thinking about salience. Early drafts from Columbia, pp. 1-55.
  • Izard, C. E. (1997). Human Emotions. New York: Plenum Press.
  • Jaworski, A. & Coupland, N. (eds). (2006). The Discourse Reader. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Martin, J.R. & White, P.R.R. (2005). The Language of Evaluation. Palgrave Macmillan, London & New York.
  • O’ Meara, G. (2012). Stand Your Ground Laws Are Unnecessary. March 21. The New York Times.
  • Parkinson, B., Fischer, A., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2005). Emotion in social relations: Cultural, group, and interpersonal processes. New York: Psychology Press.
  • Prinz J. (2006). The Emotional Basis of Moral Judgements. Philosophical Explorations, 9, (1).
  • Prinz, J. J. (2004). Embodied emotions. In R. C. Solomon (ed.), Thinking about feeling: Contemporary philosophers on emotions. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 44-58.
  • Quasthoff, U. (1978). The uses of stereotype in everyday argument. J. Pragmat. 2(1), 1-48.
  • Quasthoff, U. (1989). Social prejudice as a re-source of power: towards the functional ambivalence of stereotypes. In R. Wodak (ed) Language, Power, and Ideology, pp. 137-63. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
  • Roseman, I. J., & Smith, C. A. (2001). Appraisal theory: Overview, assumptions, varieties, controversies. In K. R. Scherer, A. Schorr, & T. Johnstone (eds.), Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research (pp. 3-19). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Sperber, D. & Wilson, D.1986 [1995]. Relevance: Communication & Cognition, Oxford: Blackwell. - 1997. ‘Remarks on relevance theory and the social sciences.’Multilingua 16: 145-152.
  • Van Dijk T.A. (1984). Prejudice in Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins. - 1985. Discourse and Communication: New Approaches to the Analysis of Mass Media Discourse and Communication. Walter de Gruyter. - 1991. Racism and the Press. Critical Studies in Racism and Migration. London: Routledge.
  • Van Dijk T.A, Ting-Toomey S, Smitherman G, Troutman D. (1997). Discourse, ethnicity, culture and racism. In Van Dijk T.A (ed). Discourse as Social Interaction. London: Sage.
  • Voloshinov, V.N. (1995). Marixism and the Philosophy of Language, Bakhtinian Thought - an Introductory Reader. S. Dentith, L. Matejka & I.R. Titunik, (trans), London: Routledge.
  • Wetherell, M. and Potter, J. (1992). Mapping the Language of Racism: Discourse and the Legitimation of Exploitation. London and New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf and Columbia University Press.
  • White, P.R.R. (1998). ‘Telling Media Tales: the News Story As Rhetoric’. Unpublished Ph.D Dissertation, University of Sydney, Sydney. Retrieved from: http://www.grammatics.com/appraisal/ whiteprr/whiteprr_phd.html.
  • White, P.R.R. (2012). Exploring the axiological workings of ‘reporter voice’ news stories - Attribution and attitudinal positioning. Discourse, Context and Media, 1(2-3), 57-67.
  • Wodak, R. and M. Reisigl. (1999). Discourse and Racism: European Perspectives. Annual Review of Anthropology, 28, 175-199.
  • The 2013 Florida Statutes: CHAPTER 776 JUSTIFIABLE USE OF FORCE http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0700-0799/0776/0776.html.


Abstract - 104

PDF (English) - 38

Copyright (c) 2018 CAVALIERE F.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.