Category of time limit in administrative procedural law

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

Administrative procedural law is full of numerous and varied procedural time limits which, as time-related categories, define the temporal boundaries of the administrative process and can act as an effective regulator of administrative procedural legal relations. The article examines the concept of time limit in administrative procedural law from the standpoint of integrativeness. It notes that the studied issue was not thoroughly elaborated in science, which appears to result from the «young age» of administrative procedural law as a separate branch. The research identifies substantial characteristics of the administrative procedural time limit. It reveals the temporal content of time limit in administrative procedural law. A conclusion is reached that the administrative procedural time limit results from the impact of temporal categories on the administrative procedural legal regulation when administrative cases are settled by a public administrative authority and a court. The administrative procedural time limit is recognised as a tool used for temporalizing the administrative process and aimed at ensuring the dynamism of administrative procedural activities through duration, speed, rhythm and cyclicity. The article identified the trend towards the legislative refinement of the administrative procedural time limits. In an integrative sense, the attributes inherent to the administrative procedural time limit reveal the versatility and rich inner content of the concept of time limit in administrative procedural law, which results from the legal synthesis of temporality and authoritative procedural activities of public administrative authorities and courts in settling administrative cases. The article proposed the definitions for the category of «time limit in administrative procedural law» both in a narrow and broad sense, as well as with an emphasis on the temporal side of the examined category.

About the authors

Elena V. Beliakovich

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)

Author for correspondence.
Email: beliakovich_ev@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6285-3709

Judge, Presiding Judge of the Commercial Court of Chelyabinsk Region, Candidate of Legal Sciences Degree-Seeking Student of the Law Institute, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)

6 Miklukho-Maklaya str., Moscow, 117198, Russian Federation

References

  1. Bakhrakh, D.N. (1993) Administrative law. Moscow, BEK Publ. (in Russian).
  2. Bakhrakh, D.N. & Renov, E.N. (1989) Proceedings on cases of administrative offences. Moscow, Znanie Publ. (in Russian).
  3. Berman, H.J. (1988) Toward an Integrative Jurisprudence: Politics, Morality, History. California Law Review. 76 (4), 779-801. Available at: https://lawcat.berkeley.edu/record/1113174 [Accessed 15th July 2021].
  4. Druzhkova, E.V. (2015) Procedural terms in the legal regulation of proceedings in cases of administrative offenses. Diss… of Candidate of Legal Sciences. Saint Petersburg, Saint Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation. (in Russian)
  5. Dugenets, A.S. (1995) Procedural terms in the proceedings on cases of administrative offences. Diss… of Candidate of Legal Sciences. Moscow, VNII MVD Rossii. (in Russian).
  6. Dugenets, A.S. (2002) Procedural terms in the proceedings on cases of administrative offences. Moscow, VNII MVD Rossii Publ. (in Russian).
  7. Evdeeva, N.V. & Perov, O.U. (2015) Integrative Legal Thinking: the concept and methodology of synthesis. Juridical science: history and modernity. (1), 39-46. (in Russian).
  8. Ershov, V.V. (2010) Fundamental Theoretical and civil-law principles of law. Moscow, RAP Publ. (in Russian).
  9. Grafsky, V.G. (2010) Law as result of using a rule of legal justice (the integral approach). State and Law. (12), 5-13. (in Russian).
  10. Garaev, А.А. (2010) Terms in administrative offences (Law). Zakonnost’. (8), 53-55. (in Russian).
  11. Hall, J. (1947) Integrative Jurisprudence // Interpretation of Modern Legal Philosophies. New York: Oxford University Press. 325-332.
  12. Kosareva, N.V. (2013) Terms in the proceedings on cases of administrative offences. Diss… of Candidate of Legal Sciences. Moscow, Management Academy of the Ministry of the Interio of Russia. (in Russian).
  13. Koval’, L.V. (1979) Administrative and legal tortious relationship. Kiev, Vishcha shkola Publ. (in Russian).
  14. Mardasova, M.E. (2014) Procedural and process terms in tax law. Diss… of Candidate of Legal Sciences. Moscow, Institute of State and Law Russian Academy of Sciences (in Russian).
  15. Meshcheryakova, T.R. (2011) Terms in the legislation on administrative offences. Diss… of Candidate of Legal Sciences. Ekaterinburg, Ural Institute of Economics, Administration and Law. (in Russian).
  16. Paleha, R.R. (2010) The integrative concept of the legal understanding as a methodological paradigm of the law. Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Pravo. 1 (8), 61-72. (in Russian).
  17. Panova, I.V. (2000) Actual problems of administrative process in the Russian Federation. Diss…. Doctor of Legal Sciences. Ekaterinburg, Ural state law academy. (in Russian).
  18. Romashov, R.A. & Salnikov, V.P. (ed.). (2010) Theory of State and Law: Textbook. V 3 t. T. 3. Saint Petersburg, Fond «Universitet» Publ. (in Russian).
  19. Telegin, A.S. (1983) Investigation of administrative offences. Diss… of Candidate of Legal Sciences. Sverdlovskij ordena Trudovogo Krasnogo Znameni yuridicheskij institut im. R.A. Rudenko (in Russian).
  20. Tsukanov, N.N. (2010) On procedure for assessing terms in the proceedings on cases of administrative offences. Administrative Law and Procedure. (3), 41-44. (in Russian).
  21. Yakupov, R.Kh. (1972) Procedural terms in Soviet criminal proceedings. Abstract Diss … Candidate of Legal Sciences. Moscow, Higher School of the USSR Ministry of Internal Affairs. (in Russian).
  22. Zakhartsev, S.I. & Salnikov, V.P. (2021) Comprehend theory as an approach to the knowledge of law. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika. (15), 166-174. (in Russian).
  23. Zelentsov, A.B. & Yastrebov, O.A. (2017) Judicial Administrative Law. Moscow, Statut Publ. (in Russian).
  24. Zhenetl, S.Z. (2005) On some issues of the use of procedural terms in cases of administrative offences. Jurist. (7), 47-51. (in Russian).
  25. Zuckerman, A. (1999) Assessment of Cost and Delay - a Multinational Perspective. In XI World Congress on Procedural Law: Procedural Law on the Threshold of the New Millennium. Wien. Universitat. Pp. 41-42.
  26. Zueva, L.Yu. (2014) Procedural terms in the proceedings on cases of administrative offences. Diss… Candidate of Legal Sciences. Moscow, Russian Legal Academy of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation. (in Russian)

Copyright (c) 2021 Beliakovich E.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies