THE GENESIS AND CRITICS OF THE PROSECUTORS AMICUS CURIAE IN INTERNATIONAL LAW

Cover Page

Abstract


The article traces in detail the origins of the prosecutor amicus curiae in the practice of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. This mechanism will subsequently be endorsed by all the ad hoc international criminal tribunals. It is noted that their emergence is the result of an unsuccessful experience in prosecuting offences against the administration of justice by the Tribunal under the previous legal framework. It is also stressed that, despite its effectiveness, the prosecutor amicus curiae mechanism cannot constitute the central component of the policy of prosecuting such acts and that, at this stage, it may even be considered an obstacle to its formation, given the occasional nature of the prosecutor amicus curiae‘s intervention in the international criminal proceedings and lack of continuity. As an alternative, it is proposed to establish a special independent organ - the Prosecutor for the offences against the administration of justice - in the international criminal tribunals, including the International Criminal Court.


About the authors

Ekaterina A. Kopylova

Embassy of the Russian Federation to the French Republic and the Principality of Monaco

Author for correspondence.
Email: kopylova.diplomatie@gmail.com
40-50 Boulevard Lannes, Paris, 75116, France

Candidate of Legal Sciences, Legal Advisor to the Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary Ambassador of the Russian Federation to the French Republic and the Principality of Monaco

References

  1. Bartholomeusz, L. (2005) The amicus curiae before international courts and tribunals. Non-State Actors and International Law. (5), 209–286.
  2. Bry, K. (1993) An overview of illinois contempt law: a court’s inherent power and the appropriate procedures and sanctions. Marshall Law Review. (23), 223–256.
  3. Cibulski, С. (2005) The Amicus curiae as an instrument of perfectionning the legal system: materials of the Third International Conference «Access to justice. The practice of amicus curiae — friend of court», available at: https://csip.kg/documents/HFHR/1/attPart01/31a.pdf (Accessed 05 June 2020). (in Russian).
  4. Chinkin, Ch., Mackenzie, R. (2002) International Organizations as Friends of Court. International Organizations and International Dispute Settlement: Trends and Prospects. Ardsley, N.Y. Transnational Publishers Inc., pp. 295–311.
  5. Crema, L. (2013) Testing Amici Curiae in International Law: Rules and Practice. The Italian Yearbook of International Law. 22(1), 91–132.
  6. Gomez, K.F. (2012) Rethinking the Role of Amicus Curiae in International Investment Arbitration: How to Draw the Line Favorably for the Public Interest. Fordham International Law Journal. 35(2), 510–564.
  7. Hiéramente, M., Müller, Ph., Ferguson, E. (2014) Barasa, Bribery and Beyond: Offences against the Administration of Justice at the International Criminal Court. International Criminal Law Review. 14 (6), 1123–1149.
  8. Kopylova, E.A. (2019) Prestupleniya protiv mezhdunarodnogo ugolovnogo pravosudiya [The Offences against the Administration of the International Criminal Justice]. Moscow, Boslen Publ. (in Russian).
  9. Lysenko, V.V. (2008) The amicus curiae in the theory and practice of the NGOs and the European Court of Human Rights. Russian Judge. (9), 38–42. (in Russian).
  10. Marusin, I.S. (2002) Grounds and Procedure for Prosecution of Crimes Against Justice in International Judicial Institutions. Russian Yearbook of International Law 2002. SaintPetersburg, Russia-Neva Publ. pp. 114–127. (in Russian).
  11. Mirgorodsky, E.D. (2019) The Amicus Curiae in international law: history and modernity. Journal of the Oleg Kutafin University (MSLU). 10 (62), 199–204. (in Russian).
  12. Sands, Ph., Mackenzie, R. (2008) International Courts and Tribunals, Amicus Curiae. Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, available at: https://opil.ouplaw.com/view/ 10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e8 (Accessed 05 June 2020).
  13. Shelton, D. (1994) The Participation of Nongovernmental Organizations in International Judicial Proceedings. The American Journal of International Law. 88 (4), 611–642.
  14. Smaltz, D.C. (1998) The Independent Counsel: A View from Inside. Georgetown Law Journal. 86 (6), available at: https://govinfo.library.unt.edu/oic/SMALTZ/speeches/GTLJ.htm (Accessed 06 June 2020).
  15. Trikoz, E.N. (2009) The Offences against the Administration of Justice in the International Criminal Law. The Current Problems of the International Justice. Moscow, Law and Public Policy Institute Publ. 227–236. (in Russian).
  16. Van den Eynde, L. (2019) Amicus Curiae: European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Procedural Law, available at: https://opil.ouplaw.com/view/ 10.1093/law-mpeipro/e3753.013.3753/law-mpeipro-e3753 (Accessed 05 June 2020).
  17. Viljoen, F., Abebe, A. (2014) «Amicus Curiae» Participation Before Regional Human Rights Bodies in Africa. Journal of African Law. 58 (1), 22–44.
  18. Wiik, A. (2018) Amicus Curiae Before International Courts and Tribunals. Nomos/Hart.
  19. Williams, S., Woolaver H. (2006) The Role of the Amicus Curiae before International Criminal Tribunals. International Criminal Law Review. 6(2), 151–189.
  20. Williams, S., Woolaver, H., Palmer, E. (2020) The Amicus Curiae in International Criminal Justice. Hart Publishing.

Statistics

Views

Abstract - 164

PDF (Russian) - 80

Cited-By


PlumX

Dimensions

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2020 Kopylova E.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies