Germany’s Participation in Peacekeeping Operations in Africa at Present

Cover Page

Abstract


The article is devoted to the study of the peculiarities of Germany’s participation in UN, EU and NATO peacekeeping operations in Africa. The relevance of the research topic is due to conflicting opinions about the need to preserve and prolong most operations in the region. In this regard, the opinions of experts with optimistic and pessimistic views on this problem are considered, and the stages of the evolution of peacekeeping activities are highlighted. The purpose of the study is to prove the validity of the assumption of the critical theory of the use of peacemaking by countries as a tool for realizing their foreign policy aspirations. Based on the analysis of German efforts to increase its military contingent in UN peacekeeping operations and maintain positions (despite the presence of oppositional representatives of the Parliament) in EU and NATO operations, it is proposed to identify the cause-and-effect relationships of such behavior. To achieve this goal, we used the method of historicism, which helped to identify the problems of the past that Germany is trying to get rid of by participating in the operations of international organizations, as well as the method of comparative analysis, which regulates the comparison of Germany’s efforts in missions with its foreign policy tasks. The analysis of the documents of the international organizations under consideration, as well as legislation and foreign policy doctrines of Germany, allows us to assess not only the legality of the country's operations outside its borders, but also to identify foreign policy priorities in order to obtain reliable results when comparing them. In conclusion, we present the following conclusions: the evolution of Germany’s efforts in the UN, EU and NATO missions in Africa. The results of the research reflect the postulates of critical theory in the process of studying German peacekeeping activities in Africa.


About the authors

Natalia Viktorovna Ivkina

RUDN University

Author for correspondence.
Email: ivkina-nv@rudn.ru
Moscow, Russian Federation

PhD in History, Senior Lecturer, the Department of Theory and History of International Relations

References

  1. Bretherton, C. & Vogler, J. (2006). The European Union as a Global Actor. Abingdon: Routledge.
  2. Duchene, F. (1973). The European Community and the Uncertainties of Interdependence. A Nation Writ Large? London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  3. Duffield, M. (2001). Global Governance and the New Wars: The Merging of Development and Security. London: Zed Books.
  4. Field, M.R.V. (1994). The Brussels Summit: A Military Perspective. NATO Review, 42 (1), 7—11. URL: https://www.nato.int/DOCU/review/1994/9401-2.htm (accessed: 12.08.2020).
  5. Greig, J.M. & Diehl, P.D. (2005). The Peacekeeping-Peacemaking Dilemma. International Studies Quarterly, 49 (4), 621—645.
  6. Koops, J.A. (2011). The European Union as an Integrative Power: Assessing the EU’s “Effective Multilateralism” with NATO and the United Nations. Brussels: Vubpress.
  7. Koops, J.A. (2016). Germany and United Nations Peacekeeping: The Cautiously Evolving Contributor. International Peacekeeping, 23 (5), 652—680. doi: 10.1080/13533312.2016.1235092
  8. Manners, I. (2009). The Concept of Normative Power in World Politics. Danish Institute for International Studies. URL: http://pure.diis.dk/ws/files/68745/B09_maj_Concept_Normative_Power_World_ (accessed: 01.03.2019).
  9. Merlingen, M. & Ostrauskaite, R. (2006). European Union Peacebuilding and Policing. Governance and the European Security and Defence Policy. Routledge.
  10. Paquez, A.-S. (2003). La politique de la France au Kosovo était-elle “gaulliste”? Institut européen de l’Université de Genève. (In French).
  11. Poopuu, B. (2020). The European Union’s Brand of Peacebuilding. Palgrave Macmillan.
  12. Pugh, M. (2004). Peacekeeping and Critical Theory. International Peacekeeping, 11 (1), 39—58.
  13. Pugh, M. (2005). The Political Economy of Peacebuilding: A Critical Theory Perspective. International Journal of Peace Studies, 10 (2), 23—42.
  14. Richmond, O.P. (2014). The European Approach to Peacebuilding. Palgrave Macmillan.
  15. Stein, T. (2000). Germany’s Constitution and Participation in International Peacekeeping Operations. Asia-Pacific Review, 7 (2), 33—40.
  16. Tardy, T. (2004). Peace Operations in World Politics after 11 September 2001. London: Frank Cass.
  17. Trunov, F.O. (2018). Features of Germany’s Participation in the Settlement of Armed Conflicts in Mali and Somalia. Current Problems of Europe, 4, 160—182. (In Russian).
  18. Weber, H. (1999). Retour sur la guerre du Kosovo. Entretien avec Hubert Védrine. La revue socialiste, 10 (2),22—43. (In French).
  19. Whitman, R.G. (1998). From Civilian Power to Superpower? The International Identity of the European Union. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  20. Wittig, P. (2008). Deutschland als aktive Friedensmacht Plädoyer für die Unterstützung des UNO — Peacekeeping. Zeitschrift für Politik, Neue Folge, 55 (4), 435—443. (In German).

Statistics

Views

Abstract - 105

PDF (Russian) - 107

Cited-By


PlumX

Dimensions


Copyright (c) 2020 Ivkina N.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies