Focus and Scope

RUDN Journal of Language Education and Translingual Practices is published quarterly since 2007 under the editorship of Professor V.P. Sinyachkin and professor U.M. Bahtikireeva

The thematic field of the journal includes actual problems of general linguistics, didactics, as well as integrative areas of modern philology: cultural linguistics, sociolinguistics, political linguistics, bilingualism issues, cross-cultural communication.

During its ten-year history the Journal has been offering for discussion by the scientific community "milestones" problems of modern linguistics: Language in Human and Human in Language; Language in a multicultural society; peculiarities of bilingual linguistic consciousness of the individual; mechanisms of perception and learning of foreign language in the cognitive and pragmatic aspects; effective strategy of linguistic didactics and many others.

From 2016, the Journal extends the research context of publications and invites for cooperation culture experts, historians, philosophers, and other representatives of the humanities.

Mission (the supertask) of the Bulletin is to integrate linguistic and extralinguistic experience of experts from different countries and scientific disciplines in order to develop a universal strategy of tolerant interaction between people of various languages and cultures. The Editorial Board believes that the Language (Own, and others') may be not only the barrier, but also a bridge to understanding another culture, mentality and ethnic identity. Reducing the confrontational perception of the Other and the proclamation of self-worth of each language and each ethnic group in the multicultural metasociety is our Mission that should be implemented in the research tasks as:

  • Identification, description, classification of linguistic facts of declared problematics;
  • Publication of the results of experimental methods of teaching and learning of foreign languages;
  • The study of language processes in multicultural environment;
  • The study of bi- and translingual practices in literature, media; etc.

Genre preferences (sections and formats) of the journal:

  1. A critical review. It is a systematization of research material on this problem and its subsequent discussion. The work must not only summarize the scientific concepts of predecessors, but also to demonstrate the own author's opinion on scientific issues.
  2. The original research article. It is the result of fundamental, applied, experimental study of specific scientific problems. Typically, the lenght of work amounts to 6 thousand words. The internal composition of the research generally includes the following elements:
    - Abstract and keywords.
    - Introduction, which accents a scientific problem, determines its relevance, theoretical and practical value; it also includes a brief overview of the approaches to its study. It is advisable to describe the stages of research and the methods of analysis.
    - Main part, including (if necessary) the discussion.
    - Conclusion, summarizing the results of the issue and giving the scientific outlook on the problem, as well as recommendations on the use of the results, etc.
    - References in accordance with Russian and international standards (see instructions.).
  3. The scientific essay is a research-reflection on a particular scientific problem, characterized by free inner form and comparably low volume (up to 1 thousand words).
  4. Interview. Publication of interviews on current topics with prominent scientists, writers, public figures.
  5. Scientific review is a critical appraisal of existing scientific publications on the issue (monographs, articles, doctoral research and so on.).
  6. Polylog. By prior arrangement (Application) Author can participate in a planned scientific discussion with other authors. Topics of discussion will be published on the journal's website in advance.

The journal is addressed to philologists, philosophers, scholars in cultural studies, specialists in Language education and Applied Linguistics. Its authors are PhDs, post-graduate students, PhD candidates and MA students both from Russia and abroad.

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

A double-blind peer review method is mandatory for processing of all scientific manuscripts submitted to the editorial stuff of the journal. This implies that neither the reviewer is aware of the authorship of the manuscript, nor the author maintains any contact with the reviewer.

  1. Members of the editorial board and leading global experts in corresponding areas of sciences, invited as independent readers, perform peer reviews. Editor-in-chief, deputy editor-in-chief or science editor choose readers for peer review. We aim to limit the review process to 2-4 weeks, though in some cases the schedule may be adjusted at the reviewer’s request.
  2. Reviewer has an option to abnegate the assessment should any conflict of interests arise that may affect perception or interpretation of the manuscript. Upon the scrutiny, the reviewer is expected to present the editorial board with one of the following recommendations:
    • to accept the paper in its present state;
    • to invited the author to revise their manuscript to address specific concerns before final decision is reached;
    • that final decision be reached following further reviewing by another specialist;
    • to reject the manuscript outright.
  3. If the reviewer has recommended any refinements, the editorial staff would suggest the author either to implement the corrections, or to dispute them reasonably. Authors are kindly required to limit their revision to 3 months and resubmit the adapted manuscript within this period for final evaluation.
  4. We politely request that the editor be notified verbally or in writing should the author decide to refuse from publishing the manuscript. In case the author fails to do so within 3 months since receiving a copy of the initial review, the editorial board takes the manuscript off the register and notifies the author accordingly.
  5. If author and reviewers meet insoluble contradictions regarding revision of the manuscript, the editor-in-chief resolves the conflict by his own authority.
  6. The editorial board reaches final decision to reject a manuscript on the hearing according to reviewers’ recommendations, and duly notifies the authors of their decision via e-mail. The board does not accept previously rejected manuscripts for re-evaluation.
  7. Upon the decision to accept the manuscript for publishing, the editorial staff notifies the authors of the scheduled date of publication.
  8. Kindly note that positive review does not guarantee the acceptance, as final decision in all cases lies with the editorial board. By his authority, editor-in-chief rules final solution of every conflict.
  9. Original reviews of submitted manuscripts remain deposited permanently (not less than 5 years).
  10. Manuscript reviews are not published. Reviews can be sent to the Ministry of Education and Sciense of Russian Federation in case of query.

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Indexing

Articles have been published in this journal are indexed by several systems:

 

Publishing Ethics

The journal's publisher, RUDN University, is a co-founder and a member of the Association of Scientific Editors and Publishers (ASEP), Russia, and supports the ASEP Declaration on the Ethical Principles of Scientific Publications http://rasep.ru

The ethic policy of this journal is based on recomendations from international commettees:

  

Editorial responsibilities

Editors have sole responsibility for acceptance or rejection of a manuscript. The manuscript may be rejected by the editor on the stage prior to peer-review for a solid reason (inappropriate topic for journal, clearly of poor scientific quality, the article was previously published elsewhere, essential contradiction to ethical principles of the Journal was detected). Editors should only accept a paper when reasonably certain. Editors should guarantee that the quality of the papers conforms to internationally accepted scientific and publication ethical guidelines. If there is conflict of interest of the editor with the author of the article, the article should be transmitted to another editor.

The editor transmits all the submitted manuscripts, which were not rejected according to the reasons stated below, for peer-review. The editor chooses the reviewers out of the most competent specialists on the topic of the article.

Editors should preserve anonymity of reviewers and should not tell the reviewers the names of the authors.

Editors should guarantee the quality of the papers and the integrity of the academic record and be willing to publish corrections, clarifications, retractions and apologies when needed.

Reporting standarts

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Review and professional publication articles should also be accurate and objective, and editorial opinion works should be clearly identified as such.

Advertising Policies

The editorial board adheres to ethical standards in its work and, above all, defending the right to editorial independence. Placement of promotional materials and sponsorship can not influence in any way on editorial decisions and editorial content. The journal does not publish materials to accompany the advertising and does not sell advertising for specific articles. Advertising and information materials is not mixed with the editorial content.

All decisions on advertising placement are only accepted by the publisher. The editors reserve the right not to accept advertising materials, placement does not meet the publication policy.

Data Access and Retention

Authors may be asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism

Plagiarism takes many forms, from passing off another paper as the author(s) own paper, to copying or paraphrasing substantial parts of another(s) paper (without attribution), to claiming results from research conducted by others. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

The Editorial Board considers the following to be the forms plagiarism:

  • Use (word for word citing) of any materials in any value without indicating the source;
  • use of images, pictures, photographs, tables, diagrams, schemes or any other forms of graphical information presentation without indicating the source;
  • use of images, pictures, photographs, tables, diagrams, schemes or any other forms of graphical information presentation published in scientific and popular issues without approving by copyright holder;
  • use of the materials without written permission, the authors or copyright holders of which don’t permit use of their materials without special approvement.

The Editorial Board considers the following to be the forms of incorrect borrowing:

  • Absence of graphical highlighting of literal text citation when there are references to the source;
  • incorrect references (incomplete bibliographic description of the sources, which prevents their identification;
  • reference not to the first source of the borrowed text without clear indication of this fact (mistake in primary source determination);
  • absence of references from the text to the sources enumerated in the list below the article;
  • excessive citation (in case there are references to the sources and graphical highlighting of the cited text), the volume of which is not justified by the genre and aims of the article.

Only original works are acceptable for publication in journal. The journal does not allow any forms of plagiarism.

If the authors have used the work and/or words of others, that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

The journal is using "ANTIPLAGIAT" software for plagiarism detection in all Russian-language manuscripts. The Google Scholar is used for English-language manuscripts. Papers will be rejected from any stage of the publication process (even if the article was published already) if plagiarism will be fined.

Papers will be rejected from any stage of the publication process (even if the article were published already) if plagiarism will be fined.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

In general, an author should not submit for consideration in another journal a previously published paper. Publication of some kinds of articles (eg, clinical guidelines, translations) in more than one journal is sometimes justifiable, provided certain conditions are met. The authors and editors of the journals concerned must agree to the secondary publication, which must reflect the same data and interpretation of the primary document. The primary reference must be cited in the secondary publication.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work. Information obtained privately, as in conversation, correspondence, or discussion with third parties, must not be used or reported without explicit, written permission from the source. Information obtained in the course of confidential services, such as refereeing manuscripts or grant applications, must not be used without the explicit written permission of the author of the work involved in these services.

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors.

The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Hazards and Human Subjects

Authors should include a statement in the manuscript that informed consent was obtained for experimentation with human subjects. The privacy rights of human subjects must always be observed.

Statement of Human Rights

When reporting experiments on human subjects, authors should indicate whether the procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 and 2008. If doubt exists whether the research was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration, the authors must explain the rationale for their approach, and demonstrate that the institutional review body explicitly approved the doubtful aspects of the study.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Examples of potential conflicts of interest which should be disclosed include employment, consultancies, stock ownership, honoraria, paid expert testimony, patent applications/registrations, and grants or other funding. Potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed at the earliest stage possible.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the authors obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper. If the editor or the publisher learn from a third party that a published work contains a significant error, it is the obligation of the author to promptly retract or correct the paper or provide evidence to the editor of the correctness of the original paper.

Retraction guidelines

In some cases the Editorial Board may consider retracting a publication.

The reasons for retraction may be the following:

  • it constitutes plagiarism, including borrowed pictures, tables, diagrams, etc. If plagiarism was detected after publication (see Plagiarism Policy);
  • third party expresses claims concerning copyrights for the article or its parts;
  • the findings have previously been published elsewhere before the date of its publication in the journal.

The published article has serious errors, which place its scientific value in question.

In such cases the Editor should initiate the revision, after which the article may be retracted. The Act on retraction is complied, which is signed by the editor-in-chief. The copy of the Act is being sent to the author of the article.

In this case the article is not physically withdrawn from the published edition and the file of the issue on web site. The Editorial Office publishes the notification on retraction of the article on the corresponding page of the issue content on the official site of the Journal. The Editorial Office should attentively consider issuing an expression of concern about the revealed problems in the published materials.

The Editorial Board considers it a responsibility of authors and reviewers to promptly inform about the missed mistakes and breaches revealed after the publication of the article.

Privacy Statement

Information about the authors (surname, name, family name, affiliation, e-mail, contact number), which is provided by them for publication in the journal, is becoming available for indefinite range of persons, for which the authors give their permission by providing his article in the online system on the website of the journal.

The following data is published for the convenience of the authors with the aim of the full and correct account of publications and their citation by the corresponding bibliography companies and providing the possibility of contacting the authors ans the scientific society.

Personal information provided by the authors in addition to the enumerated below include additional e-mails and phones. These will be used only for contacting the authors in the process of preparing the publication. The Editorial Board may not transmit this information to the third party, who can use in for some other purposes.

 

----

The page is based on original materials from the Elsevier: http://cdn.elsevier.com/promis_misc/ethicalguidelinesforauthors.pdf

 

Publication Fee

Publication process in this journal is free for all authors.

The journal charge no publication fees for authors - including those of peer-review management, manuscript processing, journal production, Open-Access, online hosting and archiving.

The journal asks no article processing charge in any forms.

 

Editorial Board

Prof. Vladimir Sinyachkin — Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow — Editor-in-Chief

Prof. Uldanai Bakhtikireeva — Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow — Vice-editor

Olga Valikova - Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia - Managing Secretary

Members of Editorial Board

Prof. Sergey Kibalnik - the Institute of Russian Literature (the Pushkin House), Russian Academy of Sciences

Prof. Firman Wiliam - Indiana University, USA

Prof. Evdokimova Svetlana - Brown University, USA

Prof. Suresh Canagarajah - Pennsylvania State University, USA

Prof. Andrew Moody - University of Macau, China

Prof. Tarasov E.F.Linguistics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Prof. Lebedko M.G. - Far Eastern Federal University

Prof. Kulibina N.V. - The Pushkin State Russian Language Institute

Prof. Mahanbet Dzhusupov — Uzbekistan State University of World Languages, Tashkent, Uzbekistan

Prof. Aleksandr Efremov — Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia

Prof. Sholpan Zharkynbekova — Eurasian National University named after L.N. Gumilyov, Astana, Kazakhstan

Dr. Viktoriya Kurilenko — Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia

Prof. Valentina Maslova — Vitebsk State University named after P.M. Masherov, Belarus

Prof. Zoya Proshina — Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russia

Prof. Natalia Muranska Constantine the Philosopher University, Nitra, Slovak

Prof. Olga Rudenko-Morgun — Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia

Prof. Madina Tlostanova — Linkoping University, Linkoping, Sweden

 

Journal Archiving

The information about all the articles published is archived in Russian Electronic Scientific Library (eLIBRARY.ru). The direct URL to the journal issues: http://elibrary.ru/contents.asp?titleid=11968. You can search through article metadata (title, author, keywords, abstract etc.) on eLIBRARY.ru. The URL to article’s full text is available on the article’s page on eLIBRARY.ru. The articles’ full texts are stored on the journal’s server and can be accessed through this page (http://journals.rudn.ru/education-languages/issue/archive) or from each article's individual page on eLIBRARY.ru.